gnomon
Well-Known Member
edit: Deleted my previous reply.
If we differentiate between sound and a sound wave then I would agree with Fluffy. However, I think this could be a semantical difference. There is the hypersonic effect being studied in which sounds humans cannot can produce a physiological reaction.
There is also infrasound. While these inaudible sounds which can produce a physiological reaction may still be classed as an observation made by the human verifying its existence it does show that sounds existence is not dependent upon the sense of hearing.
By the scientific definition, if a tree falls in the wood and no one is around to hear it a sound is still produced. Of course, as Fluffy has already shown (darn you!) that such reasoning is inductive and therefore I can only truly state that if a tree falls ... I believe it makes a sound.
If we differentiate between sound and a sound wave then I would agree with Fluffy. However, I think this could be a semantical difference. There is the hypersonic effect being studied in which sounds humans cannot can produce a physiological reaction.
There is also infrasound. While these inaudible sounds which can produce a physiological reaction may still be classed as an observation made by the human verifying its existence it does show that sounds existence is not dependent upon the sense of hearing.
By the scientific definition, if a tree falls in the wood and no one is around to hear it a sound is still produced. Of course, as Fluffy has already shown (darn you!) that such reasoning is inductive and therefore I can only truly state that if a tree falls ... I believe it makes a sound.