Faith can be defined as unjustified belief according to the rules of critical analysis. Is one's belief the conclusion of a sound argument or demonstrably correct? Then it is justified. All other belief is faith-based (unjustified). It's a clear and simple definition that allows one to decide quickly which beliefs are justified and which are not and therefore believed by faith.
That's when you turn the other cheek and offer him that one as well. But it should never get that far. One really shouldn't mock a man until he's walked a mile in the other guy's shoes for just this reason, so he'll be a mile away and barefoot when you tell him he's a simiform.
We don't have houses in taxonomy. You're thinking of Game of Thrones. We have clades, which are nested hierarchies. Man and modern monkeys have a last common ancestor like any two groups of organisms, but it is a non-prosimian primate, the first of these being monkeys, which are in essence arboreal mammals (hair rather than scales or feathers, womb, lactate) with dry noses, opposable thumbs on five-fingered hands with flat nails rather than claws, and tails. These were the first Simiiformes. Like the prosimians, their ancestors, who were the first primates, they also featured bony eye sockets, stereoscopic vision, and a brain with an enlarged cortex relative to other mammals.
The definition of an ape is a tailless primate with pouchless cheeks, a fused frontal bone, a convoluted cerebral cortex, and color vision. But there's an argument for grouping humans separately from the non-human apes, which are hairy, arboreal herbivores that hang and swing from branches (monkeys walk on top of them), brachiate when on the ground, and are prelinguistic, whereas human beings have diverged away from all of that. Still, they all remain apes by the definition given above.
