Not at all a problem with Bahais. It is the same 'Noor-e-Ilahi' (Glory of Allah) which stops at Bahaollah for the next 850 years.
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (Bahais shiver at his name), Gandhi, Nelson Mandela, Martin Luther King Jr. were also 'Noor-e-Ilahi'.
Everything in the universe, humans, animals, vegetation and non-living objects too are 'Noor-e-Ilahi'.
What is it which is not 'Noor-e-Ilahi'?
This belief in "messengers" from God is always a problem. Some people are going to believe, and some people are going to reject the messenger.
Ironically, there are more followers of Mirza Ghulam Ahamad then Baha'u'llah.
There are more people that believe in Joseph Smith's Book of Mormon and the Latter-Day-Saints than believes in the Baha'i Faith.
They have a very simple message... "Let's all stop fighting and live as one people." Then they complicate it by claiming to have fulfilled the promises made in all religions.
Then there are these titles they gave themselves... The Bab, meaning the gate, and Baha'u'llah, meaning the Glory of God. I don't know, but does either "The Gate" or "The Glory of God" mean anything to people in some of other religions?
It's mainly directed at Christians. And is it a fulfillment of the supposed prophecy that the Glory of God was seen coming from the gate that faces East. But these guys took those titles.
It would be like someone taking the title "The Lamb of God" and then saying, "Look, I'm talked about in the Book of Revelation as being the One."
Now with Hinduism, as far as I know, Baha'u'llah never claimed to be the return of Krishna. That came later when Abdul Baha' made that claim. But, since Baha'is like to find ways to connect themselves to most all religions, I'm wondering if they are trying to find ways to connect to those Hindus that don't follow Krishna?
