rosends
Well-Known Member
the Gittin 57 quote is the last item discussed on the page -- scroll down
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
In Genesis 3:14 God is cursing the serpent contradicting your theory. additionally, it was God who promised Avraham the holy land and it was he who got the people of Israel out of Egypt to Mount Sinai and told us 613 commandments, which as I was told, Christ was not objecting to them or telling his followers this commandments were the word Satan. Also, I do recall the first commandment of the ten commandments Exodus 20:2 "I am the Lord your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage." in this phrase, God identified by his name. Judaism does not believe in two godsMy belief is that the God of the Old Testament was not God the Father, but Satan. This inference stems from God not wanting Adam and Eve to eat of the tree of knowledge. They were conned by Satan. God gave them to Satan, who was given the job to rule as the Lord of the Earth and care of the humans. This explains the nature of the God of the Old Testament being both good and evil. Good and Evil was the tree of Satan. The God of creation was neutral. God did not make equal parts matter and antimatter like good and evil. He made matter.
The other premise is connected to God and his Sabbath rest. On the seventh day God rested. The Bible does not tell us how long this rest lasted. We can infer that based on comparing the first six days of creation to that comes after. One may notice there is nothing as epic in the Bible, as the first six days, until Revelations; new heaven and earth. You do not need God to part the sea, since Satan could do that as Lord of the Earth. Even images of Hell has Satan connected to the Earth.
During a Sabbath rest, one is not suppose to work. If the Sabbath is an image of heavenly things, God would not be working, while he rested. He would have made arrangements in advance for others to do the chores as he rested. God assigned Satan to be Lord of the Earth, as he rested, to care for the humans. The Tree of Knowledge was arranged in advance, knowing Adam and Eve would chose Satan due to his charm. Satan was condoned in heaven at that time; part of the plan as God rested. Satan is not thrown from Heaven until Revelations, when God was getting ready to go back to work.
Jesus, before he began his ministry, was approached by Satan who among others things offers him all the wealth and power of the kingdom of the Earth, if Jesus would bow and serve him. Had he accepted the offer he would have become the Messiah who was expected; rich and powerful and able to subdue the enemies of Israel. But Jesus refuses the offer.
Jesus said, nobody has seen the Father, except the son. This comment goes back to the Sabbath rest. Jesus was also on Sabbath rest; Father and Son both resting. When Jesus refuses the offer of the Messiah Job, he had no choice, since as the son, he too was on Sabbath rest and he could not work as the Messiah. However, this offer violated the pact between Satan and God; political problems appear, since Satan tried to get his son to violate the Sabbath. Jesus would flow with the spirit and wait until God was ready to work. This is described in Revelations as Jesus and the Father both prepare, to set a new cycle of creation in motion; uninstall and reinstall.
Dear Rudi,In Genesis 3:14 God is cursing the serpent contradicting your theory. additionally, it was God who promised Avraham the holy land and it was he who got the people of Israel out of Egypt to Mount Sinai and told us 613 commandments, which as I was told, Christ was not objecting to them or telling his followers this commandments were the word Satan. Also, I do recall the first commandment of the ten commandments Exodus 20:2 "I am the Lord your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage." in this phrase, God identified by his name. Judaism does not believe in two gods
So, you believe in predestination? If that's the case, then anything I do wrong I can blame God for?It is apparent that the Father is invisible and directs what is to occur and when
I feel that a NEW TESTAMENT that reveals key words in Hebrew is helpful to understanding what a literal translation is and brings a clearer understanding of the MESSIAH/CHRIST. As for being behind, it would seem to depend upon whom one places his faith and trust.@Little Nipper -
Since the so-called Orthodox Jewish Bible is not Jewish, let alone Orthodox, you might want to quit while you’re behind and not quote from it further.
I believe that GOD is fully aware of what everyone is thinking and planning to do. And if something is going against GOD divine will, HE will step in. One cannot blame GOD for foreknowing what one's intentions are. As for predestination, GOD predestined that both you and I would be born by allowing sin to occur. The only reason the two of us exist is on account that Adam and Eve sinned. If they had not sinned, our existence would be in doubt, as we were born in sin.So, you believe in predestination? If that's the case, then anything I do wrong I can blame God for?
@Little Nipper -
Since the so-called Orthodox Jewish Bible is not Jewish, let alone Orthodox, you might want to quit while you’re behind and not quote from it further.
I don't believe that because it puts God in the position of creating evil with some people per Calvinism. And the question of God being omniscient is very problematic.I believe that GOD is fully aware of what everyone is thinking and planning to do. And if something is going against GOD divine will, HE will step in. One cannot blame GOD for foreknowing what one's intentions are. As for predestination, GOD predestined that both you and I would be born by allowing sin to occur. The only reason the two of us exist is on account that Adam and Eve sinned. If they had not sinned, our existence would be in doubt, as we were born in sin.
I feel the intent is not to convert Jews but to introduce Jews to the MESSIAH whom they are still waiting the arrival of. As for Yiddish, Jesus apparently spoke Aramaic --- the common language of that time. Though JESUS did speak to the teachers of the LAW in the temple at Jerusalem at the age of 12, and astounded them with HIS knowledge --- so HE would have spoken and read Hebrew also in order to read scripture and explain it.It's my understanding that Phillip E. Goble's "The Orthodox Jewish Bible" is liberally sprinkled with Hebrew and Yiddish terms in order to add some flavor of "authenticity" to its basic purpose of converting Jews to Christianity.
Sooo many Yiddish terms in that thing...
One question: Did Jesus speak Yiddish? Who knew!
I feel the intent is not to convert Jews but to introduce Jews to the MESSIAH whom they are still waiting the arrival of. As for Yiddish, Jesus apparently spoke Aramaic --- the common language of that time. Though JESUS did speak to the teachers of the LAW in the temple at Jerusalem at the age of 12, and astounded them with HIS knowledge --- so HE would have spoken and read Hebrew also in order to read scripture and explain it.
We have been introduced and we threw him to the curb even before he died, all those years ago.I feel the intent is not to convert Jews but to introduce Jews to the MESSIAH whom they are still waiting the arrival of. As for Yiddish, Jesus apparently spoke Aramaic --- the common language of that time. Though JESUS did speak to the teachers of the LAW in the temple at Jerusalem at the age of 12, and astounded them with HIS knowledge --- so HE would have spoken and read Hebrew also in order to read scripture and explain it.
I think most people forget that almost all of the NT was written by Jewish people who understood the meaning of the TaNaKh and applied it as such.I feel that a NEW TESTAMENT that reveals key words in Hebrew is helpful to understanding what a literal translation is and brings a clearer understanding of the MESSIAH/CHRIST. As for being behind, it would seem to depend upon whom one places his faith and trust.
What might appear as "Nasty" to some can be a poignant expression of hope for others.Aramaic is clearly not Yiddish, and there's something farshtunken in that innocently claimed intent merely "to introduce Jews to the MESSIAH..."
And GOD allowed the Romans to destroy their temple built by Herod as I believe a direct result. It must be understood that nearly all Apostles and most of the disciples were Jews.We have been introduced and we threw him to the curb even before he died, all those years ago.
if you are going to make cases from the gospels, about which I don't care, those cases will not be really useful. The temples were destroyed for other reasons, not Jesus.And GOD allowed the Romans to destroy their temple built by Herod as I believe a direct result. It must be understood that nearly all Apostles and most of the disciples were Jews.
Joseph of Arimathea was a biblical figure who played an important role in the burial of Jesus Christ. His account can be found in each of the four Gospels: Matthew 27:57–60; Mark 15:42–46; Luke 23:50–53; and John 19:38–42. He is called “Joseph of Arimathea” because “he came from the Judean town of Arimathea” (Luke 23:51) We do know that Joseph was actually a part of the Council, or Sanhedrin who "threw Jesus to the curb."
My initial response, post #407, was not intended as an attack on Christianity. It was simply a curt dismissal of the volume from which you chose to quote. If you believe that the CJB was not published with an intent to convert Jews you have obviously not read Goble nor been to the website of the organization behind the CJB’s publication.I feel the intent is not to convert Jews but to introduce Jews to the MESSIAH whom they are still waiting the arrival of.