"I go away and come again unto you."
John 14:28
But let's look at John 14:28 in the context of John 14.
Jesus said He would pray to the Father would give you another Comforter, and then Jesus said that He would not leave you comfortless, He would come to you (which is congruent with all the other verses in John 14, 15 and 16 wherein Jesus said that He would send the Comforter from the Father.) Jesus never said that the Holy Spirit would come again unto you; He said
I go away, and come again unto you (John 14:28)
But before that Jesus said
and the world seeth me no more (John 14:19) which indicates that Jesus would not be returning in the same physical body He had when He walked the earth 2000 years ago. Then Jesus said that the Father would send the Comforter which is the Holy Ghost, in His name.
So the hundred-dollar question is
who is the Comforter?
I believe that
Jesus was a Comforter as indicated in verses 16 and 18, and I believe Jesus was a Comforter because He brought the Holy Spirit. I know that Christians believe that the Comforter is the Holy Spirit, but that makes no sense because verse 26 says that the Comforter will teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever Jesus said unto you. Only a man can do that, not a spirit, and if Jesus was a Comforter it makes sense that "another Comforter" would be another man who brought the Holy Spirit and reminded people of what Jesus had said and taught things just as Jesus had taught things.
16 And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you for ever.
18 I will not leave you comfortless: I will come to you.
19 Yet a little while, and the world seeth me no more; but ye see me: because I live, ye shall live also.
20 At that day ye shall know that I am in my Father, and ye in me, and I in you.
25 These things have I spoken unto you, being yet present with you.
26 But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.
27 Peace I leave with you, my peace I give unto you: not as the world giveth, give I unto you. Let not your heart be troubled, neither let it be afraid.
28 Ye have heard how I said unto you, I go away, and come again unto you. If ye loved me, ye would rejoice, because I said, I go unto the Father: for my Father is greater than I.
No, that would be three men. I think there are only two men. The man who is ashamed of Jesus, and Jesus who will be ashamed of that man when He comes again.
Mark 8:38 Whosoever therefore shall be ashamed of me and of my words in this adulterous and sinful generation; of him also shall the Son of man be ashamed, when he cometh in the glory of his Father with the holy angels.
Luke 9:26 For whosoever shall be ashamed of me and of my words, of him shall the Son of man be ashamed, when he shall come in his own glory, and in his Father’s, and of the holy angels.
Are you saying that whosoever shall be ashamed of me and of my words refers to the first man who is ashamed of Jesus and the second man, the Son of man who will come in the glory of his Father with the holy angels, is Jesus? It could also mean that whosoever shall be ashamed of Jesus and of His words refers to the first man, and the Son of man who will come in the glory of his Father with the holy angels was Baha’u’llah.
So, Jesus was the Son of Man when He talked about the Son of Man, but when He talks about the Son of Man returning it isn't Him.
It isn’t Jesus because Jesus said he was not coming back to this world, and His work was finished here (John 14:19, John 17:11, John 17:4, John 19:30)
The return of the Son of Man who came in the glory of his Father was Baha’u’llah.
The Apocalypse of John is directly attributed to Jesus.
I do not believe that because Jesus never promised or planned to return to this world (John 14:19, John 17:11, John 17:4, John 19:30)
Like I said, I hope you understand my confusion.
I do understand it because this can be very confusing.
The Christ Spirit is not the same man Jesus Christ in the same body; it is the return of the Christ Spirit in another man with another body with a new name, as prophesied.
Isaiah 62:2 And the Gentiles shall see thy righteousness, and all kings thy glory: and thou shalt be called by a new name, which the mouth of the Lord shall name.
Revelation 2:17 He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches; To him that overcometh will I give to eat of the hidden manna, and will give him a white stone, and in the stone a new name written, which no man knoweth saving he that receiveth it.
Revelation 3:12 Him that overcometh will I make a pillar in the temple of my God, and he shall go no more out: and I will write upon him the name of my God, and the name of the city of my God, which is new Jerusalem, which cometh down out of heaven from my God: and I will write upon him my new name.
But, not the Son of Man who is recognized by all, seen by everyone from east to west, who comes in the clouds with the power and authority of the Father and who makes all of the people of the world weep?
That is a literal interpretation but it is logically impossible because of Jesus came down from the clouds he could not be seen by ALL. Also, elsewhere in many verses it says that Christ will return as a thief in the night, and the thief that comes in the night sneaks in and out as is not seen by anyone.
Baha’u’llah fulfills the prophecy of flashing from east to west but that would be another post because I have a long detailed explanation of how that happened.
Baha’u’llah also came in the clouds (which means when most people were veiled form the truth, as the clouds veil the sun), and He came with the power and authority of the Father and made the people of the world weep.
So, if that Son of Man isn't Jesus (because Jesus isn't coming back) and isn't Baha'u'llah coming back, does Baha'u'llah speak to who that is?
Again, I hope you understand my confusion and thank for any help clearing it up.
Baha’u’llah was the return of the Christ Spirit so He was the return of the Son of Man.
Baha’u’llah was also referred to on the Old Testament as
one like the Son of Man.
Daniel 7:13-14 I saw in the night visions, and, behold, one like the Son of man came with the clouds of heaven, and came to the Ancient of days, and they brought him near before him. And there was given him dominion, and glory, and a kingdom, that all people, nations, and languages, should serve him: his dominion is an everlasting dominion, which shall not pass away, and his kingdom that which shall not be destroyed.
Jesus
ascended into heaven in the clouds. Baha’u’llah,
one like the son of man,
descended from the clouds of heaven of the Will of God, and came to the Ancient of days, and they brought him near before him. And there was given him dominion, and glory, and a kingdom, that all people, nations, and languages, should serve him: his dominion is an everlasting dominion, which shall not pass away, and his kingdom that which shall not be destroyed. These verses are about an earthly Kingdom, not a heavenly Kingdom. Jesus’ Kingdom is in heaven, Baha’u’llah’s Kingdom will be on earth, after it is built by humans.
John 18:36 Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence.