If negative cannot be proved

[james blunt]

This is intriguing.

Can you explain?

It is meaningless nonsense , don't worry about it , it is nothing important , just over active imagination.

 

[Willamena]

It is meaningless nonsense , don't worry about it , it is nothing important , just over active imagination.

Ah. So a wasted post. Okay.

 

[james blunt]

Ah. So a wasted post. Okay.

Well yes I was wasted lol . Just silly doodles....

 

[`mud]

To Sustainer,
That post says to me.....there's never a `now` !
No matter where one goes in the Cosmos,
it's never a `now`.

 

[james blunt]

To Sustainer,
That post says to me.....there's never a `now` !
No matter where one goes in the Cosmos,
it's never a `now`.

Always now
Never tomorrow
Never yester
I am not a jester
This is just a tester
Time changes now to now
Age is just a memory of now....

time now tn and mn memory now

tn = mn

 

[james blunt]

The one and only ''tells'' me this....

 

[`mud]

I had an uncle that wrote like Sustainer does, he was an architect.
He read a lot of weird books, and wrote on little pieces of paper,
and threw them on the floor, he didn't have a computer.
hey Sus, how about you, and the little pieces ?

 

[james blunt]

I had an uncle that wrote like Sustainer does, he was an architect.
He read a lot of weird books, and wrote on little pieces of paper,
and threw them on the floor, he didn't have a computer.
hey Sus, how about you, and the little pieces ?

Saved in my mind and on my hard drive and all over the internet and now in your mind.
I am transferring data from my mind to your minds by the use of light. You can see my words I am sending to you from my mind, a sort of really basic telepathy.

 

[`mud]

I am finally realizing that a negative cannot be proven.
Just look at all those invisible pieces.

 

[james blunt]

I am finally realizing that a negative cannot be proven.
Just look at all those invisible pieces.

I see invisible pieces if I use my eyes, there is nothing invisible about seeing green with my mind.

 

[viole]

then why get into such an irrational position in the first place?
Regards

____________
Isn’t Atheism a world view without reasons and arguments?
Atheism people have a belief "God does not exist "
Is Atheism a claim to the nature of reality and the universe?
"There is nothing that atheism (on its own) claims is 'right.' "?
"Atheist can't be an Anti-theist & Anti-theist can't be an atheist"?
With new observations comes a new belief
It is very natural to believe

I can easily prove that 2 + 2 is NOT 5.
So, what do you mean when you say you cannot prove a negative?

Ciao

- viole

 

[paarsurrey]

I can easily prove that 2 + 2 is NOT 5.
So, what do you mean when you say you cannot prove a negative?

Ciao

- viole

It is the Atheism people who say negative cannot be proved just to avoid to provide the evidence of their stance "G-d does not exist". The view of the believers is that if Atheism people cannot provide evidence of their stance "G-d does not exist", then they should not get into this unreasonable stance. They should believe "G-d does exist" and search for Him from among the believers.
So, you have agreed that negatives could be proved as stated by you "I can easily prove that 2 + 2 is NOT 5." and that is a negative.

Regards

 

[viole]

It is the Atheism people who say negative cannot be proved just to avoid to provide the evidence of their stance "G-d does not exist". The view of the believers is that if Atheism people cannot provide evidence of their stance "G-d does not exist", then they should not get into this unreasonable stance. They should believe "G-d does exist" and search for Him from among the believers.
So, you have agreed that negatives could be proved as stated by you "I can easily prove that 2 + 2 is NOT 5." and that is a negative.

Regards

You are making a category error. To claim that negatives cannot be proven is obviously false, since there is at least one negative that can be proven. However, that does not entail that all negatives can be proven, especially when it comes to synthetic propositions. And that fact does not justify taking the positive claim seriously, without evidence.

For instance, do you believe that leprechauns exist? if not, why not?

Ciao

- viole