funnylife33
Member
Its a simple question ...
I hope someone can answer that
Thanks
I hope someone can answer that
Thanks
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
In my personal view, Vishnu is Brahman with qualities (saguna) as a result of Maya.
Yes, though I would probably use "without" rather than "beyond."This is Saguna Brahma, constrated with Nirguna Brahma who is beyond qualities and attributes?
Interesting... the choice of words and names has, if not implications, at least suggestions.Yes, though I would probably use "without" rather than "beyond."
It's important to distinguish "Brahma" from "Brahman." Brahma is a deity...the creator in the Trimurti, whereas Brahman is no deity.Interesting... the choice of words and names has, if not implications, at least suggestions.
To call Saguna and Nirguna both "Brahma" emphasizes that they are in some sense the same.
I don't associate these ideas with Nirguna Brahman. Though "absence" doesn't feel right to me, either. There is only Nirguna Brahman. Everything else is an appearance resulting from Maya.To favor the use of the word "absence" over "beyond" suggests that transcendence and uniqueness are not the ideas that one wants to associate with Nirguna Brahma.
Simple answer. Same place the Christian Father or the Islamic Allah came from.Its a simple question ...
I hope someone can answer that
Thanks
Them? their book? Who is this 'them'? Hindus have many books.I was trying to get an answer from them .
I don't have much knowledge about what their book says about it .
Perhaps. But I don't think that is quite true.Simple answer. Same place the Christian Father or the Islamic Allah came from.
I know that your religion is a bit ancient and a lot more older than most of the other religions , but that doesn't make it right .Them? their book? Who is this 'them'? Hindus have many books.
In Hinduism, the various manifested versions of Brahman all came from Brahman, which is uncreated, and eternal. In all sects, (Vaishnavism, Shaivism, Shaktism) that particular name of Brahman is also eternal, and to indicate this, often the prefix 'Para' is added. So for me, that's Parashiva.
On a side not, trying to understand dharmic faiths and concepts through an Abrahamic lens often doesn't work. This thread is an example.
I know that your religion is a bit ancient and a lot more older than most of the other religions , but that doesn't make it right .
I was trying to understand this concept of brahman ... And from most of the things i have read i undertsand that it is like something that does not have a starting point nor an end point..or a direction or a flow
And it is like something that does not even have the capacity to guide people with even a proper word or sentence ...
Its like someone trying to understand the space we live in ..
We know that it was like that there forever like that ...
I don't expect you to understand it. It's too high of an expectation. Not only that, but Brahman isn't understandable by anyone via the intellect. To be truly understood, it has to be experienced. In that sense, I also have no understanding of it.I know that your religion is a bit ancient and a lot more older than most of the other religions , but that doesn't make it right .
I was trying to understand this concept of brahman ... And from most of the things i have read i undertsand that it is like something that does not have a starting point nor an end point..or a direction or a flow
And it is like something that does not even have the capacity to guide people with even a proper word or sentence ...
Its like someone trying to understand the space we live in ..
We know that it was like that there forever like that ...