Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
It’s not the concept of Atom bomb.The first words by the first atheist, "wait a minute..."
Lack of verifiable proof.Than, what made atheists to oppose it ?
Answer carefully !
I’m not sure the concept of theists and atheists makes much sense in the context of the first ideas of gods. Nobody would have been theist or (meaningfully) atheist at that point by definition. (That said, I think the terms are more trouble than they’re worth in pretty much any context but that’s a different topic ).Than, what made atheists to oppose it ?
Answer carefully !
Than, what made atheists to oppose it ?
Answer carefully !
Theists. They are the ones who came up with the idea.Than, what made atheists to oppose it ?
Answer carefully !
Than, what made atheists to oppose it ?
Answer carefully !
Than, what made atheists to oppose it ?
Answer carefully !
ESPECIALLY, if they tell you that you will go to hell and be punished mercilessly for eternity, for NOT listening.If someone tells me they carry on conversations with their teddy bear and their teddy bear speaks to them, it's of no consequence to me unless they start telling me to listen to the teddy bear.
Than, what made atheists to oppose it ?
Answer carefully !
But, what is the problem with atheists ?I feel the ways and scenarios in which theists insist on trying to invoke the idea of God are what makes many atheists opposed to the ideas(s). I'm sure this differs somewhat from person to person.
What a kind of jealous/envy is this with somebodies ideas ?But in a nutshell... theists make atheists oppose their ideas. If the theists didn't have the ideas in the first place, there would be nothing to oppose.
Theists created concept of God for themselves, for their own sake.Lack of verifiable proof.
Lets talk about Today.I’m not sure the concept of theists and atheists makes much sense in the context of the first ideas of gods. Nobody would have been theist or (meaningfully) atheist at that point by definition. (That said, I think the terms are more trouble than they’re worth in pretty much any context but that’s a different topic ).
We don’t even know if the first people to come up with the concept will have definitively believed it to be true. They might have just raised it as a possibility, one some people will have dismissed while others will have taken it further. We’re talking about such distant history, long before any kind of records survive that all we have is (largely pointless) speculation.
Who told to subscribe ? I don't think any theist did, even in the past.Being told to subscribe to the concept?
If someone tells me they carry on conversations with their teddy bear and their teddy bear speaks to them, it's of no consequence to me unless they start telling me to listen to the teddy bear.
Why to oppose, or jealous ?Theists. They are the ones who came up with the idea.
What made you think that by doing this, theists are making any kind of application into the "High Commission of Atheists" on this earth, and you MUST run a background check ?That the concept lacked sufficient evidence to convince or sustain their belief.
I don't think any theist ever told this forcefully to any atheist, unless atheist went to ask.ESPECIALLY, if they tell you that you will go to hell and be punished mercilessly for eternity, for NOT listening.