Secret Chief
Very strong language
Maybe only with the way some farmers treat their livestock.
most would be more accurate, the standard industry production model.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Maybe only with the way some farmers treat their livestock.
Why?
It was a joke. It's because soy contains estrogenic compounds, so it's a stereotype that guys who eat and drink a lot of soy are unmanly. Soy cultivation is bad for the environment, though.What do you mean by "soy boy," and why would it be immoral to be one?
I should note that I eat meat, myself, and believe there are ethical ways to do so.
That's probably true.most would be more accurate, the standard industry production model.
source?Soy cultivation is bad for the environment.
most would be more accurate, the standard industry production model.
Why Soy is Bad for You and the Planetsource?
And bad compared to what? Is it better or worse than beef cultivation, or pork, or even something like corn?
“In the time it takes to read this entire article, an area of Brazil’s Amazon rainforest larger than 200 football fields will have been destroyed, much of it for soybean cultivation, much of which is fed to livestock.”
In the comments section of the first article it is claimed in Europe about 60-70% of soya is for human consumption. More generally, I'm not saying there is no truth in the article, but on reading some of the comments quite a few say they disagree with her assessment.“In the time it takes to read this entire article, an area of Brazil’s Amazon rainforest larger than 200 football fields will have been destroyed, much of it for soybean cultivation, much of which is fed to livestock.”
The article says much of the soy grown commercially goes to feed live stock. But that is an understatement. Over 90% of the soy grown goes to feed live stock. When you eat that hamburger, or steak, or pork chop, you are consuming (albeit indirectly) more soy than the average vegan could manage.
If more of this product went directly to feed humans it would ironically decrease the demand for it and be better for the environment.
Ethical debates: Is soy bad for the environment? ♻CW
I had no idea. Thank you."regular removal of honey from hives can contribute to declining honey bee populations, especially if the honey comes from a business driven by profit"
- Honey: an ethical guide | Friends of the Earth
Not a fan of smoking either. If it is too hot it can melt the bees' wings.I had no idea. Thank you.
I'm very much in the same camp as you, and I react the same way in eating as little meat as possible as my wife is much more the carnivore.I'm a hypocrite:
I know that eating meat and animal products is morally wrong
But I do it anyway even though it would be possible for me not to
I know it's wrong but do it anyway
That's the definition of a sin
I am weak-willed
I value my food more than I do the welfare of my fellow sentient beings
I was once vegan for two weeks
But I was on as night out and had a kebab having had plenty of beer
I then relapsed and went back to eating meat
I cannot imagine ever being a vegan
Even though it is the right thing to do
For me the whole meat thing is so ingrained
HOWEVER: I am going to try to cut back on eating meat with a view to eventually transitioning to being mostly vegetarian
Also, I have stopped using cow milk, I now only ever buy Soya milk