• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

I'm sick of it.

Jeremy Mason

Jeremy Mason

Well-Known Member
methylatedghosts said:
That's not what I'm talking about.

They're both stupid enough to buy into this whole "He is worse than I am" bollocks.

It's ridiculous that none seem to be able to run a campaign only talking about their own good points, rather than an opponent's negatives.
Click to expand...

Perhaps if the American public would read a book, spend more time with their kids and stop watching the boob tube every spare minute, their wouldn't be all this nonsense to begin with, right?
 
Autodidact

Autodidact

Intentionally Blank
I don't have a problem with one candidate talking about what's wrong with the other one's policies, or even his record, if it's accurate. I have a huge problem with talking about some irrelevant person the other candidate met once, or something. It's ridiculous and ineffectual.
 
DallasApple

DallasApple

Depends Upon My Mood..
Autodidact said:
I don't have a problem with one candidate talking about what's wrong with the other one's policies, or even his record, if it's accurate. I have a huge problem with talking about some irrelevant person the other candidate met once, or something. It's ridiculous and ineffectual.
Click to expand...

COME ON!!...Obama climbs out the window at night to meet irrelevant people and conspire with them to kill us..

Dont you know Obama doesnt even want you to have a piece of bread?..Thats why he wants to be the president..He's trying to make you not go on vacation and live in a house thats hot...

OPEN your eyes lady...He's trying to take away our Sunday drives...He wants us to suffer...

Love

Dallas
 
9-10ths_Penguin

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
DallasApple said:
In a "logical" debate..You would point out your opponents weakneses...Thats part of the process...Its shouldnt be 99.999999% of what you discuss I agree...
Click to expand...
It's only in a two-party system that "don't vote for him" automatically implies "vote for me".

I wonder what it would take to get a viable third party in the US.
 
methylatedghosts

methylatedghosts

Can't brain. Has dumb.
9-10ths_Penguin said:
It's only in a two-party system that "don't vote for him" automatically implies "vote for me".

I wonder what it would take to get a viable third party in the US.
Click to expand...
Changing your government entirely. You'd need to instigate an MMP or similar. Basically, you'd need a parliament where the number of seats a party gets is proportional to the votes.

Changing to that, I can see, will meet a LOT of resistance. Especially by the ones who currently stand to lose power as a result.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top