Of course it's a silly statement as you quoted it. I'll thank you for not quoting half sentences out of context with the intent of changing my meaning moving forward.
You're just arguing, and not listening properly, it was contextual to what was stated....
It was shortened to show the simplicity of that part of it was generalized, and flawed from its offset.
the thread was a generalization of anyone who hides behind qualifiers with ill intent or in the interest of circumventing the rules.
Every time i've been charged with breaking rules, i've apologized in the site feedback section, and explained where any confusion lies....
Literally trying not to break rules, put my points across clearly, without personal statements, and debate huge flawed concepts of religious institutions in comparison to their texts.
unless you are starting a debate under the premise of your own assessment and passing it off as universal truth
This is a religious forum, loads of people do that all the time, that is the whole point...
Fair enough some people try to claim objectiveness by quoting scholarly opinion; yet they will pick what suits their own assessment of universal truths.
disparaging or insulting a person or group of people based on such an assessment.
Firstly I never mean to be insulting to the person, yet merely the faulty religious beliefs, that can be justified by not only their text, yet a majority globally to confirm it is a universal truth commonly understood.
Disparaging statements of a whole religious organization being misguided is what religious debate is about, it isn't to compliment each other....
Yet even within that I'm generally not making audacious statements that the whole is totally the wrong way, as that isn't beneficial to redirecting someone to a slight adjustment of their current beliefs.
I'm not sure if this is a call for attention or if you are genuinely this sensitive.
Firstly on somethings can cope with debating religious topics; yet this is a personal vendetta about my own character, which is approximate to internet bullying by quite a few on here...
if you are that sensitive about having your motives or intent challenged
Don't mind having my motives challenged, which from birth was to save the world through fixing global religions as prophesied...
With the backup plan if it fails, we just remove humanity and keep who we like.
this forum might not be the venue for you to share your claims and views.
Been on this forum 14 years of debating people, and it is the optimum place to get the point across...
Don't expect people to accept it, yet did expect it was a place to debate fairly, and even paid because thought the rules would protect everyone; clearly that isn't the case, as personal biases have now become a majority from me challenging mods opinions, and them taking it personally.
You may wish to think about taking a break from the forum.
Thank you for making people feel welcome; not sure where i've upset you personally, yet if you let me know, will apologize and try to rectify the situation.
In my opinion.
