A
angellous_evangellous
Guest
OK, I see another critical flaw:
As Deut pointed out, I cannot conclude that "all probabilities are meaningless." Despite theorizing that for some ratios there could be an indefinate number of possible trials, the probability still has meaning because we can know the ratio of the trials that we can know (like guessing how many planents exist in our galaxy which can support life to the total number of planents), and the ratio will be true until we have more information.
O well, I'd rather be proven wrong here than somewhere else...
Thanks, Deut... as you can imagine, no essay will ever come out of this absurd nonsense. I would give you frubals but I have to pass them around first.
As Deut pointed out, I cannot conclude that "all probabilities are meaningless." Despite theorizing that for some ratios there could be an indefinate number of possible trials, the probability still has meaning because we can know the ratio of the trials that we can know (like guessing how many planents exist in our galaxy which can support life to the total number of planents), and the ratio will be true until we have more information.
O well, I'd rather be proven wrong here than somewhere else...
Thanks, Deut... as you can imagine, no essay will ever come out of this absurd nonsense. I would give you frubals but I have to pass them around first.
