That seems such a lame joy/goal for a supreme being.IS Bob the piano teacher amused by the predictable outcome of his lessons? that you become a better piano player? I think he finds joy in your progress yes
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
That seems such a lame joy/goal for a supreme being.IS Bob the piano teacher amused by the predictable outcome of his lessons? that you become a better piano player? I think he finds joy in your progress yes
That seems such a lame joy/goal for a supreme being.
God doesn't love automatons....
Do you consider it a lame joy/goal for a parent to want to see progress in their children?
It's love, what greater joy/goal is there?
These appear to be different relationships.Do you consider it a lame joy/goal for a parent to want to see progress in their children?
It's love, what greater joy/goal is there?
These appear to be different relationships.
A god would be intellectually far above us miserable humans.
It would be like Richard Feynman running an ant farm.
They'd have nothing in common.
But children progress into fellow adult humans.
Even babies are far above ants.We are far above our children at first, though they are made in our image, and we look forward to the day we can know each other.
Our helping close that gap is what makes the relationship special right?
So same with God , just on a far far greater scale.
Even babies are far above ants.
And we know they'll grow.
But humans never rise above being human.
Maybe gods omniscient cause everything he thinks can happen, does happen, even contradictory scenarios in contradictory universes, if thats what god wanted to do.If they had free will, then there could be more than one outcome.
But Bob knows the outcome in advance.
Because Bob cannot be wrong, the outcome he knows is the only possible one.
Free will isn't free if only one of a human's choices is possible.
It is at best the illusion of free will.
So......you may pick free will.....or you may pick Bob being omniscient.
But you cannot pick both.
Clearly, this god stuff can become quite complicated & murky.Maybe gods omniscient cause everything he thinks can happen, does happen, even contradictory scenarios in contradictory universes, if thats what god wanted to do.
Would I trade the bliss of nothingness for the suffering, pain and absurdity which is life? Hell yeah. Speaking of hell, life is hell. An amalgam of organisms each of which exists for the sole purpose of perpetuating itself, first, and the species of which it is a part second. And in so doing annihilating other life forms. What a total nightmare. The worst part of which is being a member of the species which is the alpha predator, and which has the self consciousness to know how messed up and frightful the whole thing is. If there IS a God responsible for this hell, all the worse. Better for suffering to be entirely random without meaning than purposeful. And finally if death is not simply the end and nothingness, worse still. Why would anyone want personal existence to be eternal?God created a world, that still exists today, with no suffering, no challenges, no grief, no evil.. for jellyfish, and hence no joy, love, goodness either. would you trade? me neither..
Clearly, this god stuff can become quite complicated & murky.
It's so much simpler to not believe!
An amalgam of organisms each of which exists for the sole purpose of perpetuating itself, first, and the species of which it is a part second.
Aye, those things were hard to understand.That's just what opponents of the Big Bang and quantum physics used to say..
I thought God was all-loving? Why he gotta hate on the automatons??
Aye, those things were hard to understand.
But with persistence, testing, & refinement, they're.....uh.....still hard to understand.
But they become more familiar & useful.
This "god" stuff though.....it lacks testability.
As Pauli said...
"Das ist nicht nur nicht richtig, es ist nicht einmal falsch!"
Do you "love" your toaster?
Alas, I have no truth to offer you.true, and no analogy is perfect
and we're all kinda in the same untestable boat though are we not, multiverses, M theory, quantum voids?
But in a designed universe there is a logical rationale- for its secrets to be hard but not impossible to understand- to perfectly test us to our limits of curiosity and ingenuity..what better way to have your creation understood and appreciated?
But for an undesigned universe to accidentally achieve the same.. yet another strange coincidence?
If a di keeps rolling winning numbers, that's a test of it's nature, even if we can't prove it's loaded.
Alas, I have no truth to offer you.
I am also not even wrong.
Given no objectively verifiable premises from which to deduce the full nature of the universe
or universes, I remain just a simple disbeliever who is ill equipped to tell you you're wrong.