• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Iran buys plane to use in Syrian war - in violation of nuke deal

columbus

yawn <ignore> yawn
This story is actually from the International Business Times.
The same outfit that reported on Saudi Arabia's plans to build hundreds of mosques in Germany.
Tom
 

Servant_of_the_One1

Well-Known Member
Israel should shut their Zionist mouth.
Assad is the best friend of Zionists in Syria. He never attacked them in the occupied Golan Heights. If islamists capture Syria, Israel is in big problem. Because if Isis wins Israel will be their next target. Isis and Jabhat Nusrah wants first to pacify muslim lands from traitors and apostates, they said their final house is in Jerusalem.
The hatred of islamists towards Israel is mindboggling, it would make Hamas and HezbuLebanon appear as hippies!



Zionists clearly prefers Assad above Islamists:

The regime in Syria kills its citizens every day, but we must acknowledge that the opposition in Syria is composed of Muslim extremists like al-Qaeda,” he said at a fundraising event for Israel’s Tel Hashomer hospital in Moscow on Monday, according to the daily Maariv. “The question ‘what is better for Israel?’ is an important question because we must ask ourselves if we want to trade the bad regime we know for the very bad regime that we don’t know, and this is something that requires serious consideration.”

http://www.timesofisrael.com/ex-idf-chief-israel-prefers-that-assad-stay-in-power/
 

Jayhawker Soule

-- untitled --
Premium Member
Iran buys plane to use in Syrian war - in violation of nuke deal
Where is the violation?

See the International Business Times ...

“Temporary sanctions relief ... currently in place does not cover the sale or lease of complete aircraft to Iran,” said Betsy Bourassa, a representative of the Office of Terrorism and Financial Intelligence within the Treasury Department in Washington. And a representative of the State Department told IBT that it was aware of the sale and is investigating the transaction.

Under the terms of the ongoing sanctions, Iran is barred from purchasing aircraft from U.S. and European entities -- and U.S. and European entities are barred from selling them to Iran -- until Tehran has satisfied inspectors with the International Atomic Energy Agency that it has begun rolling back its nuclear program, according to sanctions lawyers at Sheppard Mullin. Calls to Iran’s Foreign Ministry in Tehran were not returned.

Although the nuclear agreement itself does not specifically require Iran to stop purchasing aircraft, it does require that Tehran "refrain from any action inconsistent with the letter, spirit and intent of this JCPOA [Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, i.e., the nuclear deal] that would undermine its successful implementation."

Read less garbage. You'll embarrass yourself less often.
 
Jayhawker - except that Arutz Sheva tends to be accurate. If you read it over time, yo will see that it almost always is accurate. It has a point of view, but then, all Israeli media outlets have a point of view. They follow the British model.
 

Servant_of_the_One1

Well-Known Member
For someone who doesn't sympathise with Isis, you do spend an awful lot of time here sympathising with Isis. ;)


I can never sympathise with a savage group that beheads people in most barbaric way.

Btw thats what isis and alqeada believes.

I dont believe arab regimes to be apostates, however they are indeed traitors and puppets. To behonest i prefer them over barbarians such as isis and alqeada. Atleast traitors dont behead people using knife in name of Allah.
 

rosends

Well-Known Member
Arutz Sheva, ...

Writing on Slate in 2014, journalist William Saletan described Arutz Sheva as more or less the equivalent of the American Fox News or the Palestinian Ma'an News Agency, offering constantly updated news of interest to a right-of-center audience. "For news," he wrote, "it’s totally on the ball."

...your source for right wing rubbish.
Maybe I am drawing an incorrect conclusion from this quote but it seems to say that Arutz Sheva chooses the news it will present based on what its audience wants to read, but not that its presentation is counter-factual (or even slanted in its presentation -- just in its choice). The closing quote indicates that A"S is "totally on the ball" which is a compliment.
 
The U.S has turned a blind eye to Israels nuclear arsenal for decades so if the U.S. feels it is against their interests to make an issue of this they won't, if they feel it is useful to them they will regardless of any written agreement.
 

dust1n

Zindīq
We have a common enemy, and we are worried about a single outdated plane going to fight a common enemy? I'm confused...
 
Last edited:
Top