YoursTrue
Faith-confidence in what we hope for (Hebrews 11)
I was asking questions, that is true, and found some answers. So thank you! (and others...)
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Irony of the evolutionary belief
- Thread starter Eli G
- Start date
YoursTrue
Faith-confidence in what we hope for (Hebrews 11)
I find it interesting also to see your continual responses including misunderstandings on your part, or -- perhaps deliberate misunderstandings -- if that's not so, I apologize, lol, as well as certain others. So thanks for a laugh again.
McBell
Unbound
Now that you have found what you were wanting to find, will your 'responses' reflect that you have actually learned anything about evolution or will they be more of the same?P.S. @McBell - I may respond to some "facts" you put up in the future -- we'll see.Oh, I don't necessarily mean you because you do not generally put up anything but ridicule, or misconceptions about me, but that's ok. Have a nice evening.
YoursTrue
Faith-confidence in what we hope for (Hebrews 11)
Since I understand the theory and also understand the mindset of certain ones, there is really nothing more to say on my part. You personally have not offered much information supporting the theory, and that is ok.
McBell
Unbound
So then you are claiming that your future posts on the subject will not be the same old nonsense you have been posting thus far?Since I understand the theory and also understand the mindset of certain ones, there is really nothing more to say on my part. You personally have not offered much information supporting the theory, and that is ok.
Funny how getting a straight forward answer from you is likened to nailing jello to a wall.
YoursTrue
Faith-confidence in what we hope for (Hebrews 11)
They are still plants. Now "science" can help figure out both how to propagate and also which plants may help certain conditions. That's a pretty graph though that you put up. Thanks for that. Interesting.
leroy
Well-Known Member
Granted..... What amazes me is your faith in that these solutions will be consistent with your own personal philosophical view
I made a reply on the multiverse, the fact that you ignore it and replied with random unrelated things show that the argument was good.
In short the BB paradox refutes the multiverse hypothesis
We Never Know
No Slack
IMO that's not a good argument since its artificial selection and in a stretch could be argued as design, purposely done for a certain outcome.
McBell
Unbound
"argument" for what?
We Never Know
No Slack
I assumed you used it for an argument for evolution, which is why I said artificial selection in a stretch could be argued as design, purposely done for a certain outcome.
If I assumed wrong my apologies.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
I really have no need of finding another source. It is pretty hard to beat Sean Carroll when he makes a claim. Plus your demand is disingenuous. Say I found the source of it. Do you seriously think that you could refute it? I am very sure that you could not understand it. But then I do not think that I could understand it either. The math is going to be some very upper level stuff.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
I am sure that he is shaking in his boots.P.S. @McBell - I may respond to some "facts" you put up in the future -- we'll see.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
They would automatically do so since my personal philosophical view is to follow the evidence.
No, it probably showed that I was just tired of your nonsense. I am not a big defender of the multiverse, but with your record your opposition to it would be evidence for it.
I seriously doubt that. Which supposed Big Bang paradox are you nattering about?
Then it's a flawed title. And it means God is fired. But that's OK, because there is no evidence that any gods exist.
Charles Philips
Banned
Science universally recognizes the "cause and effect" law as a settled science. This law states that every effect must have a cause, in other words nothing can happen unless something causes it to happen. If we apply this law to the Big Bang Theory and the Theory of Evolution, it exposes them as being fundamentally flawed theories. As both theories are lacking a cause, or foundation.If, according to evolutionists, human intelligence eventually emerged in an environment that was previously lifeless for millions and millions of years... what is so strange that a Superior Intelligence has already existed for another INFINITE number of years BEFORE that period of time?
Logic tells us that nothing came form nothing, and nothing happens unless something causes it to happen. Life is tooo complexed to suggest it came out of nothing, if we look at a Picasso painting it bares witness of an artist. How much more complexed is life. It takes a lot more faith to believe that life spontaneously evolved without a designer.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Really? I have never seen a "cause and effect law". It is the norm for most cases but not all. Do you have a link that supports you?
There are uncaused events in the sciences. When you get down to the quantum level the rules are not cause and effect. The rules are all probabilistic.
By the way, life did not "come from nothing", it probably arose naturally through complex chemistry. That is not "from nothing".
McBell
Unbound
Seems it is a philosophical notion that is taken an as an axiom even though it is not
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Oh rats. He may be a just a hit and run creationist. I just took a peek at his postings and you have seen all of them.
McBell
Unbound
They have only been a member for like one hour and forty minutes.
Don't give up hope just yet