Irony of the evolutionary belief

[YoursTrue]

Source please
meaning a list of these rich Christian scientists.


This is nothing more than an already fully refuted bold face lie.


None of the fossils presented to creationists that further demonstrate the truth of evolution is accepted.
You know why the "missing link" will never be found?
It is because once they are found, they are no longer missing.

Provide source of any fish evolving in little, itty bitty increments to become land rovers. Not "Tiktaalok." That doesn't show any growth from a fish. Just a fossil, no record of from what. It's conjecture to say that it evolved from waterdwellers. I know you won't accept that -- but! that's the way it is.

 

[YoursTrue]

Really?
When are your posts going to reflect it?

And you?

 

[McBell]

Apologies to @TagliatelliMonster for barging in, but the comment needs no explanation at all. Think about it for just a moment -- you find yourself (living) in a universe that doesn't permit life to survive: how would you explain finding yourself there, then?

Basically, from my PoV, that interaction reveals that some people do not know enough about science to have any kind of meaning discussion with,

 

[YoursTrue]

Which is why we say we don't yet know instead of attributing the unknown to unevidenced gods like children.
"When it was storming, the thunder was God bowling, lightning was the fireworks when He got a strike, and rain was angels crying because they lost." jfreak070

Whether you realize it or not, you unwittingly and Dr. H gave a good analysis of what the Bible says. And why its writings can be trusted, but -- are reliable moreso than figuring maybe the universe came about by itself from -- nothing -- or -- maybe it did not. I know it's hard for you to figure out, but -- have a nice day, and thanks for your posts, by the way. (Oh, just to make you feel better, it wasn't easy for Dr. Hawking to figure it out either, and then at the end figured he really couldn't figure it out, but figured maybe yes, maybe no...)

 

[McBell]

If the jurors are all people like you that are -- oh, never mind --

yes, people who hold truth, facts, logic, reasoning, etc. over good feeling belifs.

We'll wait for GOD'S decision.

So never...

Ain't that cute? Man's justice you think is ok?

Mans justice is all we got.
At least until God decides to actually do something...

 

[McBell]

See, that problem you have is, along with Einstein and Newton, is as Dr. H. says -- it's hard to know because it's MANKIND's perspective. Now, and before, and will be in the future. So--with that little thought in mind -- have a nice day again!!

Grasping at straws

 

[Pogo]

See, that problem you have is, along with Einstein and Newton, is as Dr. H. says -- it's hard to know because it's MANKIND's perspective. Now, and before, and will be in the future. So--with that little thought in mind -- have a nice day again!!

??"?"

 

[Pogo]

Basically, from my PoV, that interaction reveals that some people do not know enough about science to have any kind of meaning discussion with,

It is not even the science that is the problem. LOL

 

[McBell]

Provide source of any fish evolving in little, itty bitty increments to become land rovers. Not "Tiktaalok." That doesn't show any growth from a fish. Just a fossil, no record of from what. It's conjecture to say that it evolved from waterdwellers. I know you won't accept that -- but! that's the way it is.

This appears to be you trying to change the subject because you know what was asked for can not be provided.

Not interested in rehashing your showing off your denial skills.

 

[SkepticThinker]

Provide source of any fish evolving in little, itty bitty increments to become land rovers. Not "Tiktaalok." That doesn't show any growth from a fish. Just a fossil, no record of from what. It's conjecture to say that it evolved from waterdwellers. I know you won't accept that -- but! that's the way it is.

This will be about the 900th time that myself and others have drawn your attention to mudskippers, which demonstrate exactly what you're asking for here.
Maybe this time you'll look into it.

Meet the Mudskipper: The Fish That Walks on Land

Are there fish that walk on land? Amphibious fish certainly can. Learn what the mudskipper — the most extreme of all amphibious fish — can teach us about evolution.

www.discovermagazine.com

Mudskippers and Their Genetic Adaptations to an Amphibious Lifestyle - PMC

Mudskippers are an interesting group of goggle-eyed amphibious fish that can live both in water and on land. They are a useful model for obtaining insights into the genetic mechanisms underlying the terrestrial adaptations of amphibious fish. This ...

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Mudskippers blink—and that's a huge evolutionary clue

The mudflat-dwelling fish's ability to blink its eyes is shedding light on how our own ancestors evolved to live on land.

www.popsci.com

 

[McBell]

And you?

I am not the one claiming to be highly knowledgeable in a field of study.
How about you?
What claims of superior knowledge/education do you make?

 

[leroy]

Apologies to @TagliatelliMonster for barging in, but the comment needs no explanation at all. Think about it for just a moment -- you find yourself (living) in a universe that doesn't permit life to survive: how would you explain finding yourself there, then?

Agree, Unless you want to argue that we are Boltzmann Brains, that is an obvious truth……… then what? What is the point?

 

[Evangelicalhumanist]

Agree, Unless you want to argue that we are Boltzmann Brains, that is an obvious truth……… then what? What is the point?

But I don't argue that - physicists use the Boltzmann brain thought experiment as a reductio ad absurdum argument for evaluating competing scientific theories. That's where it's best left.

 

[YoursTrue]

yes, people who hold truth, facts, logic, reasoning, etc. over good feeling belifs.


So never...


Mans justice is all we got.
At least until God decides to actually do something...

I am so glad I learned the sad facts of man's justice. I am thankful to the God I worship for that.

 

[YoursTrue]

This appears to be you trying to change the subject because you know what was asked for can not be provided.

Not interested in rehashing your showing off your denial skills.

.nothing to do with your accusations. Since you want people to provide sources, what about you?

 

[McBell]

.nothing to do with your accusations. Since you want people to provide sources, what about you?

What claim of mine do you want evidence for?

 

[leroy]

But I don't argue that - physicists use the Boltzmann brain thought experiment as a reductio ad absurdum argument for evaluating competing scientific theories. That's where it's best left.

Ok so given that we are living things and that we exists, it is obvious that we live in a life permitting universe…………….then what?

What is the point, ? why mentioning something as obviously true like that?

 

[Subduction Zone]

Ok so given that we are living things and that we exists, it is obvious that we live in a life permitting universe…………….then what?

What is the point, ? why mentioning something as obviously true like that?

Because the Boltzmann brain is very similar to your extreme "what ifs". It is rather pointless. When your what ifs are two far out of the norm you might as well be saying "What if we were just Boltzmann brains?'

 

[YoursTrue]

What claim of mine do you want evidence for?

Whenever you say something to refute. Produce evidence for your refutation.

 

[McBell]

Whenever you say something to refute. Produce evidence for your refutation.

Does not work that way.
If I make a claim that you want a source for, just ask.

Unless of course YOU are going to do the same thing.....