Charles Philips
Banned
So, now you admit that there's no evolution, as the theory of evolution hinges on the hope that corcoduck's are found. Otherwise it remains an impossible theoryThere is no "crocoduck stage."
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
So, now you admit that there's no evolution, as the theory of evolution hinges on the hope that corcoduck's are found. Otherwise it remains an impossible theoryThere is no "crocoduck stage."
Not even a rational basis to build a rejection of the theory on. The theory doesn't posit crocoducks. That's a Comfy Ray fallacy. Seems you are unaware of what the theory says or that such nonsense is meaningless.So, now you admit that there's no evolution, as the theory of evolution hinges on the hope that corcoduck's are found. Otherwise it remains an impossible theory
That is an interesting conclusion. A position that ultimately leads to a nihilistic, isolationist position on an individual basis.Since you find out version of evolution wrong, how do you explain the diversity of life on earth, Is it all an illusion due to lack of spirituallity, that we by definition cannot attain, or do you have anything to communicate with the rest of the world?
If you live in your spirit world and deny all else including our ability to understand, there is no point in your pretending to communicate.
Man, I wish you had the sense to see how ridiculous that is. You got a Z-minus in biology, right?So, now you admit that there's no evolution, as the theory of evolution hinges on the hope that corcoduck's are found. Otherwise it remains an impossible theory
If, according to evolutionists, human intelligence eventually emerged in an environment that was previously lifeless for millions and millions of years... what is so strange that a Superior Intelligence has already existed for another INFINITE number of years BEFORE that period of time?
Why don't you take time to go learn some science. And also learn why creationist claims are false.This is like the foutrth post where you evade the question………. I won’t even try to ask again
Communication is only possible when two people agree with each others world view, otherwise it's just a clash of civilizations and nobody has communicated anything. They say the average person has an attention span of15 seconds, before they pull the triggerSince you find out version of evolution wrong, how do you explain the diversity of life on earth, Is it all an illusion due to lack of spirituallity, that we by definition cannot attain, or do you have anything to communicate with the rest of the world?
If you live in your spirit world and deny all else including our ability to understand, there is no point in your pretending to communicate.
So you think you can only talk to people in your own little echo chamber, then why are you here in a place that is all about talking to people of different world views?Communication is only possible when two people agree with each others world view, otherwise it's just a clash of civilizations and nobody has communicated anything. They say the average person has an attention span of15 seconds, before they pull the trigger
Well, you just shown that you're clueless as to what the theory you claim to believe teaches. You can't have it both ways, you're desperately holding on to the fence sitting position of ignorance.Not even a rational basis to build a rejection of the theory on. The theory doesn't posit crocoducks. That's a Comfy Ray fallacy. Seems you are unaware of what the theory says or that such nonsense is meaningless.
No worries, I can see how ridiculous the ToE is. That's why I haven't taken the kool aidMan, I wish you had the sense to see how ridiculous that is. You got a Z-minus in biology, right?
If you are similar to the other creationists that post in here, you don't even understand the basics, and so are in no position to pass judgment.No worries, I can see how ridiculous the ToE is. That's why I haven't taken the kool aid
I think we believe very close to the same way? the heart, the blood stream, the nervous system, the lungs, the brain and other vital organs, need to all be functional, in the first few seconds of life. For example what if one vital organ came first, would the one vital organ survive without all of the rest? The answer is an absolute No! You're right there is not one stick of evidence for evolution.Well, you just shown that you're clueless as to what the theory you claim to believe teaches. You can't have it both ways, you're desperately holding on to the fence sitting position of ignorance.
You need to make up your mind once and for all, do you believe that only fully "evolved" finished creatures were created (that's creationism) or do you side with the crocoduck theory which claims creatures evolved (that's the silly evolution theory). Can you see how foolish it is to believe in both at the same time when they are mutually exclusive???
I'm a little confused here. When is it that you think are "the first few seconds of life"?the heart, the blood stream, the nervous system, the lungs, the brain and other vital organs, need to all be functional, in the first few seconds of life.
at birth of a baby is one example, or at any point in time. all animals and humans need functioning vital organs all at the same time, not by themselves, I am not talking about as they are formed in the womb. Can say the heart, lungs or brain survive by themselves, waiting for the other vital organs to evolve? even a few seconds later without the other vital organs, the answer is always no!I'm a little confused here. When is it that you think are "the first few seconds of life"?
No, that would be the straw man that you proclaim. I accept the theory based on the evidence. I don't believe it like it was some sort of religion. It is a valid scientific theory.Well, you just shown that you're clueless as to what the theory you claim to believe teaches.
Once again, the ignorance on display here is not mine.You can't have it both ways, you're desperately holding on to the fence sitting position of ignorance.
Fully evolved is your meaningless claim. It is neither a claim of science nor a biblical claim.You need to make up your mind once and for all, do you believe that only fully "evolved" finished creatures were created (that's creationism)
I don't side with your crocoduck strawman as proposed by Comfy Ray and parroted by those ignorant of science and holding positions that seem to be desperate with fear of science.or do you side with the crocoduck theory which claims creatures evolved (that's the silly evolution theory).
It would be foolish to consider anything you have declared as science. There is no proposed crocoduck. It is made up out of obvious, perhaps willful misunderstanding of science and, so it seems, the Creation story as well. Tsk, tsk, tsk.Can you see how foolish it is to believe in both at the same time when they are mutually exclusive???
I'm assuming that this means you think an unborn fetus is not alive? Is it because you think it is an inanimate object like a rock? Or is it that you think it is dead?at birth of a baby is one example,
How does this answer the questions asked of you and not come off looking like those questions are being dodged?Communication is only possible when two people agree with each others world view, otherwise it's just a clash of civilizations and nobody has communicated anything. They say the average person has an attention span of15 seconds, before they pull the trigger
I don't know what your talking about, nobody mentioned "talking" we were discussing "communication" taking is cheap, it just bounces off people like water off a ducks back.So you think you can only talk to people in your own little echo chamber, then why are you here in a place that is all about talking to people of different world views?
Crocoducks? Dude, your understanding of evolutionary theory is poor that you really need to take a break from posting and do a bit of learning. The following post is no substitute for a good book on basic evolution, but its an easier place to start:So, now you admit that there's no evolution, as the theory of evolution hinges on the hope that corcoduck's are found. Otherwise it remains an impossible theory
How would the mother survive without all her vital organs all there at the same time? Then on top of all that the first mother's body has to be able to have a child, so not only does the mother need all the vital organs the mother needs to be capable of having a child develop inside her body. Oh and that's really possible? So all this stuff happened all by itself huh over billions of years that's a laugh.I'm assuming that this means you think an unborn fetus is not alive? Is it because you think it is an inanimate object like a rock? Or is it that you think it is dead?