Adjusting for population proportions whites are less likely to be killed by police than minority groups, your source even says as much. Police killings and racism are two separate issues though in my opinion. Racism merely compounds the issue of killer police, and from what I've seen, racism only serves to derail the debate about use of force. We're not going to solve the problem of police accountability and militarization by talking about racism, and vice versa. It's like trying to solve a pothole problem by building better suspensions in cars.
You're giving me nothing to disagree with here!
Let's not bore fellow posters.
So I'll say something controversial.
There's an automatic assumption that black males are targeted because of racism by white folk.
Some problems with this presumption of racism by white cops & government:
- Some of the cops who kill black guys (eg, Freddie Gray) are also black.
- There's the possibility that black guys are more prone to crime.
- Baltimore is governed by black folk.
- We don't see discussion of the statistical difference between killing black males v females,
suggesting that this disparate gender effect (discrimination) is tacitly acceptable.
I argue that even after adjusting the killings for the racial percentages of populations, there should be an adjustment for the propensity of black males causing circumstances resulting in their being killed, eg, attacking the cop, brandishing a gun. How much should this be? I don't know. There would still be racism, but obsession with this singular problem should not be the tail which wags the dog.