Fluffy
A fool
A completely fair point. I do expect people who use arguments like this to have some sort of moral consistency though. For example, it annoys me when people see nothing wrong with chopping up and eating animals but they do have a problem with raping them.Having sex with an animal can be likened to rape.
If this is your only argument against bestiality, then would I be right in thinking that if you voted in the above poll, you would have gone for the second option?
Secondly, I have noticed a lot of people who have voted the third option have used the argument which Natural Submission gave and no other. Therefore I am at a loss as to why they still felt it wrong in the scenario where consent was given, as is suggested by the second option. Am I missing something here?