DanishCrow
Seeking Feeds
Tariqs words, not mine. He refers to what he perceives to be shared european values such as democracy, religious and gender/sexual equality.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
In a continent I doubt 'shared values' is ever going to work. There are ultra-cons and ultra-libs in Europe. There's not really any such thing as pan-Europeanism in terms of ideology and quite right too; let each country dictate itself in these areas.Tariqs words, not mine. He refers to what he perceives to be shared European values such as democracy, religious and gender/sexual equality.
Sorry. I'm just in a mood to have a rip-roaring debate about something. I was kind of maybe hoping you'd hit back with something. Anything. Lol. NevermindThat may be so, but I don't see how it's especially relevant to my post, or the OP. Tariq* offers an opportunity to practice islam in a way that harmonizes with Searchingforgods ideals, why he chose to interpret the writings anew doesn't change their utility.
* Though his is only one of several currents of modernist, reformed islam
Does your question in any way come down to what other Muslims might think about your cherry-picking?
In my opinion, cherry-picking ideas -- and not just religious ideas -- is a possible mark of wisdom. Some folks protest, but wise men and women have always gone for the best ideas regardless of what others have told them to do. Why think you must accept some trashy spiritual teaching that might even hinder or prevent your spiritual progress just so you can accept a golden nugget of a teaching? What's the sense in that?
Sorry. I'm just in a mood to have a rip-roaring debate about something. I was kind of maybe hoping you'd hit back with something. Anything. Lol. Nevermind
Exactly. 'Cherry-picking' is only bad for a system that maintains itself by telling people what their beliefs are. Heaven forfend they should put any independent thought into it!
That is not true. You've made it abundantly clear how you feel about Mormonism, and I don't really care what your personal feelings on my religion are. But I can tell you one thing: Every time you post something inaccurate about Mormonism, I'll be right behind you to set the record straight.All of our religious "scripture" was written by dead people. Unless, of course you are Mormon; then everything the President of the Church says is scripture.
That is not true. You've made it abundantly clear how you feel about Mormonism, and I don't really care what your personal feelings on my religion are. But I can tell you one thing: Every time you post something inaccurate about Mormonism, I'll be right behind you to set the record straight.
Don't be so touchy. Having someone correct you doesn't need to be a soul-crushing event.Don't be so childish and defensive.
Golden, huh? Wow, I'm impressed.I've had very intimate contact with it as a Golden Investigator here in Oregon.
You're funny. I don't need to ask my bishop. I've been a Mormon all my life. I think that my nearly 70 years of personal experience as a Mormon trumps your brief stint as a "Golden Investigator."I don't actually wish to have a cat fight. Ask your Bishop.
Don't be so touchy. Having someone correct you doesn't need to be a soul-crushing event.
Golden, huh? Wow, I'm impressed.
You're funny. I don't need to ask my bishop. I've been a Mormon all my life. I think that my nearly 70 years of personal experience as a Mormon trumps your brief stint as a "Golden Investigator."
It doesn't really matter what "many Mormons see as true." What matters is what is factual, and for you to say that Mormons believe (or are supposed to believe) that "everything the President of the Church says is scripture" is simply not factual. I could post perhaps a dozen or more statements from Church leaders saying as much. The bottom line is that you are in no position to be telling anybody what Mormons do or do not believe. You have accused me of being impolite and not very Christlike. May I respectfully suggest you see about getting that beam removed from your eye. It is clearly obstructing your vision.I will make one final effort to bring this pseudo conversation back into the realm of civility. The "Words of the Prophet as Scripture" is seen by many Mormons as true.
It doesn't really matter what "many Mormons see as true." What matters is what is factual, and for you to say that Mormons believe (or are supposed to believe) that "everything the President of the Church says is scripture" is simply not factual. I could post perhaps a dozen or more statements from Church leaders saying as much. The bottom line is that you are in no position to be telling anybody what Mormons do or do not believe. You have accused me of being impolite and not very Christlike. May I respectfully suggest you see about getting that beam removed from your eye. It is clearly obstructing your vision.
It doesn't really matter what "many Mormons see as true." What matters is what is factual, and for you to say that Mormons believe (or are supposed to believe) that "everything the President of the Church says is scripture" is simply not factual. I could post perhaps a dozen or more statements from Church leaders saying as much. The bottom line is that you are in no position to be telling anybody what Mormons do or do not believe. You have accused me of being impolite and not very Christlike. May I respectfully suggest you see about getting that beam removed from your eye. It is clearly obstructing your vision.
I'm disappointed but not surprised by your response. My final refusal to join that church was good judgement on my part. My deepest sympathies to you, but you will not stop me voicing my own opinions. You've done violence to me and found a way to justify it. Not as Jesus would have it at all.
You go right ahead and voice your "opinions" all you want. You're entitled to do that on this forum. But when you state your opinions as if they were "fact," and they are inaccurate, I'll correct you. Jesus didn't condone lying either, as I recall.No, absolutely un Christ like and shameless too.
All of our religious "scripture" was written by dead people. Unless, of course you are Mormon; then everything the President of the Church says is scripture.
I'm disappointed but not surprised by your response. My final refusal to join that church was good judgement on my part. My deepest sympathies to you, but you will not stop me voicing my own opinions. You've done violence to me and found a way to justify it.
Not as Jesus would have it at all.
Speaking as a former Mormon, I can say this is categorically not true. @Katzpur is correct. I'll leave the rest of your post because I've not got much to say one way or the other about that.
What melodramatic silliness is this? Katzpur is calling you out for making an erroneous statement about her church. That's not violence. That's how internet fora (or any civilised discussion, really, should work). If you're not accustomed to being corrected then perhaps you should become accustomed.
Yeah, because correcting religious misinterpretation wasn't Jesus' style at all.
So, I am a liar? Fine.