Is Darwinism proven/accepted by official Science?

[QuestioningMind]

The journals are enterprise for producing truth out of incoming manuscripts.
Darwinism is accepted by all top journals.
Thus, Darwinism is Scientifically proven.
But Darwinism is wrong and absurd because humans can not be born by a monkey.
Thus, Science has its agenda, it is the weapon of atheism, nihilism, and naturalism.

Before the birth of Science in the 16-th century, there was Natural Theology, which has studied
Physics, Mathematics, Chemistry, etc. The Scientific Revolution is the separation between
Faith and Reason, which led to the separation between Church and State. Latter is obvious,
because if Christian hell is real, then there can not be indifference for state leaders in
the question of religions.

Sorry, but science isn't like religion where you can pick and choose which parts you want to believe and simply ignore the rest. The ToE has more verifiable evidence to back it up than any other scientific theory ever proposed.

 

[Revoltingest]

I am saying, that the technical part of Science was conducted by an organization with a different name: not Science, but Natural Theology. The Natural Theologists have discovered many things and truths in nature, e.g. Pythagorean Theorem.

What about darwinism being a lie?
I had questions about that....not geometry.

 

[McBell]

Before the advent of Darwinism, the concept of Creation was the only one,

At best this is gross ignorance.
At worst it is a bold faced lie.

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/evolution-before-darwin/

 

[Secret Chief]

monkey

or ape?

Humans are apes (Hominidae), not monkeys.

 

[RabbiO]

I am free to do whatever I want.

Yes, you are certainly free to criticize Darwin’s theory without understanding it. You are certainly free to criticize anything without understanding it. However, a word of caution - if you want to play the part of an arrogant ignoramus with delusions of adequacy, you have to be prepared for that moment when other people begin to believe you actually are one. We wouldn’t want that to happen....would we?

 

[Rational Agnostic]

The journals are enterprise for producing truth out of incoming manuscripts.
Darwinism is accepted by all top journals.
Thus, Darwinism is Scientifically proven.
But Darwinism is wrong and absurd because humans can not be born by a monkey.
Thus, Science has its agenda, it is the weapon of atheism, nihilism, and naturalism.

Before the birth of Science in the 16-th century, there was Natural Theology, which has studied
Physics, Mathematics, Chemistry, etc. The Scientific Revolution is the separation between
Faith and Reason, which led to the separation between Church and State. Latter is obvious,
because if Christian hell is real, then there can not be indifference for state leaders in
the question of religions.

Darwinian evolution hasn't been proven, because nothing in science can ever be proven. But there are MOUNTAINS of evidence for it. It's as well established a scientific theory as you can get, so for all intents and purposes, it is a fact.

 

[Revoltingest]

Darwinian evolution hasn't been proven, because nothing in science can ever be proven. But there are MOUNTAINS of evidence for it. It's as well established a scientific theory as you can get, so for all intents and purposes, it is a fact.

I prefer "repeatedly verified & found still useful" to "proven".

 

[syo]

Darwinism is Scientifically proven.

What exactly is darwinism? What is the exact theory of this -ism?

 

[night912]

Science has its agenda, it is the weapon of atheism, nihilism, and naturalism.

Then why are there so many theists using science?

 

[Tambourine]

There is no such intellectual movement as "Darwinism", what people are talking about is the Theory of Evolution, a widely accepted and well-tried theory that can explain many instances of speciation better, more coherently, and more succintly than any of the alternatives. Together with the science of genetics, we can even track more recent instances of speciation. (For example, genetic studies have recently shown that polar bears and North American brown bears are starting to interbreed, as polar bears move South due to global warming).

 

[Aupmanyav]

Science is justifiably separate from religion.

At least in case of monotheistic religions. It may not be different in Advaita Hinduism.

Undecidability, Uncomputability, and Unpredictability or how Science has run into the Q-problem by Dmitri Martila

Dmitri Martila is calling truth as a problem.
@icehorse : "And since you're in a debate forum, I'm free to tell you that you're misquoting Darwin."
As if that will stop a Bible thumper.

 

[Tambourine]

Science has started in 16-the century as non-justified separation from faith. However, prior to this departure from the faith, there were Physics, Mathematics, etc. within Natural Theology.

The way of Natural Theology begins with School/lab prayer every morning and evening.

Where did you get this from?
This is how Wikipedia defines Natural Theology:

Natural theology, once also termed physico-theology, is a type of theology that provides arguments for the existence of God based on reason and ordinary experience of nature.

This distinguishes it from revealed theology, which is based on scripture and/or religious experiences, also from transcendental theology, which is based on a priori reasoning. It is thus a type of philosophy, with the aim of explaining the nature of the gods, or of one supreme God. For monotheistic religions, this principally involves arguments about the attributes or non-attributes of God, and especially the existence of God, using arguments that do not involve recourse to supernatural revelation.

(Source)

 

[questfortruth]

What exactly is darwinism? What is the exact theory of this -ism?

Scientists call Theory of Evolution as fact. The Creationists call this "fact" as "Darwinism". Out of disrespect. People are different.

 

[Aupmanyav]

I see a Schrodinger's cat, which dies but still does not die.

 

[syo]

Scientists call Theory of Evolution as fact. The Creationists call this "fact" as "Darwinism". Out of disrespect. People are different.

So which is it? Theory of Evolution = Darwinism?

 

[questfortruth]

So which is it? Theory of Evolution = Darwinism?

It depends. If one is an atheist, then it is most likely the Theory of Evolution. If one is theist, it is Darwinism.

 

[syo]

It depends. If one is an atheist, then it is most likely the Theory of Evolution. If one is theist, it is Darwinism.

People at war. Why am I not surprised...

 

[questfortruth]

People at war. Why am I not surprised...

Theists are obligated by God of Love to love atheists, but not the atheism. The atheists are not obligated, they are free to love or to hate.

 

[A Vestigial Mote]

Scientists call Theory of Evolution as fact. The Creationists call this "fact" as "Darwinism". Out of disrespect. People are different.

What if, out of disrespect, I decided to call your religion (currently listed as "Eastern Orthodox Christianity") by a different name? What if I decided to call it "Stupidity?" Would that be just fine and dandy and fall under your excuse of "People are different?" Or might you have something to say about it?

 

[questfortruth]

Or might you have something to say about it?

Just stay within the declaration of religious freedom. Atheism is not a religion.