• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Is Einstein the idol in Scientific Community? Can True paper refute an idol?

blü 2

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Dear friends, if Einstein's Theory of Relativity is like a god, can I kill it?
F. Nietzsche seems to be "good" in killing true God by saying "God is dead", but I bet he will defend any man-made idol. But the Truth is the destroyer of idols:

One Page Refutation of Theory of Relativity of Einstein, viXra.org e-Print archive, viXra:2006.0082

Indeed, if all is relative, then this fact is absolute. I came to contradiction, thus, all is not relative.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but you appear to be saying that because observer A thinks he's stationary and observer B likewise thinks he's stationary, that gives rise to a paradox.

But one of the basic differences between Newton and Einstein is that Einstein's maths works for different frames of reference, whereas Newton's is unitary.

And that being the case, there's no paradox.

You also have the problem that Einstein's relativity works all day and all night in reality. You've probably noticed those reports with synchronized clocks, which no longer register exactly the same time after one of them has remained at base while the other has been flown around the world.

And you're no doubt aware that the GPS systems of navigation for pedestrians, cars, boats, planes and spacecraft can't attain the necessary accuracy unless and until they're adjusted to take relativity into account ─ Einstein is needed, Newton won't cut it.
 

gnostic

The Lost One
Dear friends, if Einstein's Theory of Relativity is like a god, can I kill it?
F. Nietzsche seems to be "good" in killing true God by saying "God is dead", but I bet he will defend any man-made idol. But the Truth is the destroyer of idols:

One Page Refutation of Theory of Relativity of Einstein, viXra.org e-Print archive, viXra:2006.0082

Indeed, if all is relative, then this fact is absolute. I came to contradiction, thus, all is not relative.

This is another absurd thread.

No scientific theory can turn any scientist into a god or goddess.

Where do you these stupid ideas from?

He has some successes with physics, but he gave up on Quantum Mechanics, which is another successful scientific theory.

If you want to debunk Relativity, then go ahead show your alternative hypothesis and more importantly back up your silly claims with testable and observable evidence.

Science allow for scientific theory to be challenged, but it required evidence that better support any alternative model.

Without the evidence, it is just some meaningless and unsubstantiated opinionated claims.
 

gnostic

The Lost One
Not claims, but logic.
Even logic is a claim.

Science required more than logic, it needs both logic and evidence.

If the evidence don’t support the logic, then the logic is wrong.

You forget logic, is man-made, therefore logic isn’t always right.

And btw, maths is logic.

You keep telling us that we cannot not use maths, but mathematics are tools to derive logic. Logic and maths are only representation of reality. Evidence is reality.

You really are oblivious, are you?
 

exchemist

Veteran Member
The greats are great wherever they originate.
This is another absurd thread.

No scientific theory can turn any scientist into a god or goddess.

Where do you these stupid ideas from?

He has some successes with physics, but he gave up on Quantum Mechanics, which is another successful scientific theory.

If you want to debunk Relativity, then go ahead show your alternative hypothesis and more importantly back up your silly claims with testable and observable evidence.

Science allow for scientific theory to be challenged, but it required evidence that better support any alternative model.

Without the evidence, it is just some meaningless and unsubstantiated opinionated claims.
It's interesting you say Einstein gave up on QM. I wasn't aware of that.

He did get his Nobel prize for QM (photo-electric effect) and he did work on the implications of QM on statistical mechanics (hence we have Bose-Einstein statistics). And we also have Einstein coefficients for absorption and emission in spectroscopy. So my impression is one keeps tripping over Einstein in QM.

I know he disliked the indeterminacy of QM for aesthetic reasons ("God does not play dice", etc), but did he actually give up on it?
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
TimeIsMoney.jpg
 

IndigoChild5559

Loving God and my neighbor as myself.
Dear friends, if Einstein's Theory of Relativity is like a god, can I kill it?
F. Nietzsche seems to be "good" in killing true God by saying "God is dead", but I bet he will defend any man-made idol. But the Truth is the destroyer of idols:

One Page Refutation of Theory of Relativity of Einstein, viXra.org e-Print archive, viXra:2006.0082

Indeed, if all is relative, then this fact is absolute. I came to contradiction, thus, all is not relative.
A revered genius is not at all like a worshiped god.
 
Top