Alex_G
Enlightner of the Senses
My theory is that everyone is racist, just that some people manage to mask it better than others.
This has become clear to me since living abroad for a number of years as well as general observations made whilst living in my own country.
In the region that I'm living now most countries have their own pejorative term for 'white person' and use it with casual abandon - just their normal way of speaking. We could not possibly use this kind of language in the West without causing offence or getting fired from work.
So, if , when leaving our countries, we have to put up with this daily discrimination why is there such a fuss back home about being politically correct on all occasions regarding nationality, skin colour and origin?
If you ran a store would you think it acceptable to charge people different amounts depending on their racial background?
If we are subjected to this kind of discrimination abroad why do we have to pander to the immigrant hordes invading our own shores?
note: in order to avoid the usual responses, I state that I am not talking people born and bred in the West from past immigration. That is different.
I think that everyone has the capacity to be racist, if we talk about rational adults, which is what gives the issue moral weight. I don’t think it’s useful or appropriate to just label everyone a racist at heart, because for one, as has been mentioned, i think it dilutes the term to a point of little meaning.
I do see the subtle point to which you hint at, which isn’t non-existent. I think that within the minds of humans, and the way in which we process the world around us, we do default to fear the unknown somewhat. Perhaps a better word would be apprehension. We are naturally weary of those things that seem alien to us, or so far removed from what we understand to be normality, and off which the stability of all our daily life hangs.
So i would agree that people of one culture or ethnicity, if encountering another very different group for the first time, or are just quite unfamiliar with the other group, would experience a feeling of caution and apprehension, whether outwardly expressed or not. (For the most part).
Racism is far more that this however, even if its beginning could be traced to this type of automatic apprehension. In the modern day, with the world becoming smaller, increased travel, media, education and information technology, peoples understanding and exposure to the lives and ethnic backgrounds of others is being broadened, leading to a natural disappearance of the tribal, 'stick to your own, avoid the stranger' attitude.
Racism today represents an unacceptable view on which unfair conclusions are drawn about another person character based on a superficial fact, such as skin colour. Apprehension regarding the unfamiliar is one thing, but to draw unfounded conclusions based on ignorance and fear, conclusions which demean and insult others is a moral crime, further compounded by those who unfortunately act against other people in light of such motives. This is racism in its true morally deprived form that which I think no one is fundamentally inclined to.
For me, this discussion does raise the interesting question of how morally responsible a person is whilst acting due to true ignorance or misinformation, as contrasted with the person who is well enough informed that the moral sensibility should be expected. To what extent are you responsible for your own ignorances and shortcomings, and how its effect varies when applied to different moral issues.
Alex
Last edited: