Is God hiding on the upper side of the moon ?

[ChristineM]

It's funny you say that when all my science uses present science and the present science effectively agrees with everything I'm saying in my notions . Obviously the moon is not flat , it was a conversation starter about existing life other than on Earth .

In example there could be life on Saturn , we've never been there and very much doubt we can zoom in close enough to see ''ants'' .

Anyway , have you been to the moon ? Is your reply based on education or experience ?

Show me the present science that says the moon is flat

Show me the present science that says god lives on the moon

And throwing in strawmen again does not help your argument

People have been to the moon, satellites have regularly passed the far side of the moon... As have people.

I do no need to stick my head in the fire to know it is hot in the same way that i personally do not need to go to the moon to know it has a horizon

 

[james blunt]

Show me the present science that says the moon is flat

Show me the present science that says god lives on the moon

And throwing in strawmen again does not help your argument

People have been to the moon, satellites have regularly passed the far side of the moon... As have people.

I do no need to stick my head in the fire to know it is hot in the same way that i personally do not need to go to the moon to know it has a horizon

I didn't say present science agrees the moon is flat , to the contrary I explained the point that I was joking .

My reference to present science agreement was the video and my other notions . It doesn't matter that people disagree because the physical facts of physics agree .

 

[Muffled]

I believe God is not hiding.

 

[Muffled]

That's so stupid it's funny

I believe it is because people who don't know much tend to fantasize a lot.

 

[james blunt]

I believe God is not hiding.

Nor me , ''tells'' me a lot when I think .

 

[BilliardsBall]

A flat moon !

View attachment 27260

If God was microscopic, would we see Him?

If God was galaxy-sized, have we mapped the universe?

If God cannot be a Spirit being in another dimension, should we disregard multiverse theory and string theory?

 

[james blunt]

If God was microscopic, would we see Him?

If God was galaxy-sized, have we mapped the universe?

If God cannot be a Spirit being in another dimension, should we disregard multiverse theory and string theory?

Multi visual universes , string theory not required .

 

[ChristineM]

If God cannot be a Spirit being in another dimension, should we disregard multiverse theory and string theory?

The idea of god would in no way effect a scientific theory because the idea of god is not scientific.

 

[james blunt]

The idea of god would in no way effect a scientific theory because the idea of god is not scientific.

Is the idea of a miracle scientific when there is no other answer ?

 

[dfnj]

A flat moon !

Top side of the moon is where the dark energy comes from.

 

[Willamena]

It suppose to be a bit humorous and also a bit of a serious debate about if other life exists out there .

Obviously as the public we can only believe what we are told , none of us have been into space etc .

I know! They keep trying to convince me of this Eiffel Tower thing in an imaginary place called "France," but all they have is flat photos. I'm not buying it.

 

[james blunt]

I know! They keep trying to convince me of this Eiffel Tower thing in an imaginary place called "France," but all they have is flat photos. I'm not buying it.

There is people in France who can confirm the Eiffel tower is there , there isn't many who can confirm the Moon is not flat . Most of us can only go off what we're told in regards to space .
I don't think the moon is flat and the Earths curved shadow on the moon shows the earths curvature .

 

[james blunt]

Top side of the moon is where the dark energy comes from.

Maybe you're mind controlled from there and we're like some robots .....

 

[ChristineM]

Is the idea of a miracle scientific when there is no other answer ?

Provid falsifiable evidence of a miracle that can be peer reviewed. I'll wail

 

[ChristineM]

There is people in France who can confirm the Eiffel tower is there , there isn't many who can confirm the Moon is not flat . Most of us can only go off what we're told in regards to space .
I don't think the moon is flat and the Earths curved shadow on the moon shows the earths curvature .

There are people who have been round the moon. I said that a few posts ago, seems you ignore it for some reason.

Also the surface of the moon is topographically mapped on a regular basis.

Using lasers the time taken for the return signal shows the curvature of the moon.

 

[Subduction Zone]

I know! They keep trying to convince me of this Eiffel Tower thing in an imaginary place called "France," but all they have is flat photos. I'm not buying it.

Flat photos prove a flat Earth!!

 

[dfnj]

Maybe you're mind controlled from there and we're like some robots .....

Rather than just being mindless automatons thinking we have no free-will we can always just choose to believe we have free-will.

 

[dfnj]

Provid falsifiable evidence of a miracle that can be peer reviewed. I'll wail

Unless everyone shares the same bigotry and prejudice it's simply not true. Peer review guarantees it!

Let's not be subjective about being objective. Clearly objective thinking is never influenced by subjectivity.

 

[ChristineM]

Unless everyone shares the same bigotry and prejudice it's simply not true. Peer review guarantees it!

Let's not be subjective about being objective. Clearly objective thinking is never influenced by subjectivity.

Evidence is not bigotry, peer reviewed evidence is as true as it gets as long as there is nothing to falsify it.

And i am still, objectively waiting for falsifiable evidence of god magic miracles

 

[Subduction Zone]

Unless everyone shares the same bigotry and prejudice it's simply not true. Peer review guarantees it!

Let's not be subjective about being objective. Clearly objective thinking is never influenced by subjectivity.

No one has claimed that peer review proved anything. Peer review is only a minimum, and I must shout that term MINIMUM standard that new ideas need to meet today. If someone cannot pass the relatively low bar of peer review then they are almost certainly wrong. At the very least they cannot expect others to take them very seriously without massive substantiating evidence.

Peer review does not guarantee that an idea is correct. It only guarantees that it is not stupidly wrong.