Who taught you this you have stated or did you just make it all up?
Basic science.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Who taught you this you have stated or did you just make it all up?
Who taught it to you or where did you get it?Basic science.
Who taught it to you or where did you get it?
So you are telling me that you have no knowledge of your next birthday
on the day that has yet to exist?
So you are telling me this day you have no knowledgeI know the day of my birth because it happened in the past. What will happen on my next birthday, I have no knowledge of. Don't even know if I'll be alive on that day.
Of course maybe I can make plans. But then what I have knowledge of is those plans.
If you are interested you might want to look up the book "Stranger in a Strange Land" There is a character who is what they call a fair witness. I read it when I was young and it seems the concept stuck with me.
Time is omnipotent...so much for your science and logical progression of the the first law of thermodynamics theories.The science part came from school science lessons. Making the connection between the science and the claim of omnipotence is just a logical progression of the the first law of thermodynamics.
Of course the universe may not be a closed system, in which case the idea is moot.
That's a very small view of God. As if he has to follow the natural laws he created.Nothing can be omnipotent while you (or anything else) exists.
Omnipotence is unlimited power. Power is energy divided by time.
To have unlimited power implies infinite energy.
In a closed system energy or mass cannot be created or destroyed but can be changed from one to the other.
Matter (mass), you and i, earth, every planet, sun, asteroid, speck of space dust that exists in this universe is made from energy, thus reducing the amount of available energy. So energy even if it were infinite is no longer infinite.
Hence no god can have infinite power.
Of course he is. He doesn't have to use his power just because he has all power. God allowed angels including fallen angels Free Will. He allows the battle to rage for a time. He allows us to choose. He could just erase all opposition but that is not he chooses to work.The Problem of Evil had me reevaluate if I thought God was omnipotent. I no longer think He is.
First, I will cover the Zoroastrian idea of God, and then I will go through Biblical examples.
As a syncretist, I believe that Zoroastrianism provides an accurate depiction of God. The God of Zoroastrians, Ahura Mazda, is omniscient, benevolent, but not omnipotent. The central belief of Zoroastrianism is that Ahura Mazda is in a cosmic battle between the evil god, Ahirman. Every persons actions and thoughts contributes to this cosmic battle, for better or worse. God needs our help to overcome evil, so is not omnipotent in this way.
Now to the Bible.
In the latter end of the book of Daniel, he is praying. He is praying for several weeks, as that’s how long it takes for him to get an answer. An angel eventually comes to where he is praying and apologizes, saying: “Sorry Daniel! God sent me on my way to you the second you started praying, but an evil spirit held me back for a few weeks!”
I remember as a kid, the pastor preached that this wasn’t proof that God wasn’t omnipotent, rather the amount of days was symbolic or something like that, I don’t remember completely. But I think this is proof of God’s omniscience, but lack of omnipotence.
Then there’s Jesus. Do you suppose that if another way was possible to save us, Jesus would have done it? The fact that Jesus was crucified, if we believe our God is benevolent, then surely that sacrifice must have been necessary. If that was the only available route to save man, is God omnipotent?
In the book of Revelations, it is prophesied that people in the Messianic Kingdom will rebel. Does God not have the power to prevent sin, even in heaven?
Do you believe that the God you believe is omnipotent? Why or why not?
Can He, though? Let’s look at the rebellion during the book of RevelationsHe could just erase all opposition
No this is a path that God has chosen to take... There's nothing in the narrative that says he doesn't have any other choice. Now, I'm sure he has very good reasons for choosing to do it that way, but you're adding to the text, by saying it's unavoidable.at this point in the Biblical narrative, Jesus’s earthly kingdom already exists. Heaven on Earth, yet evil must be let loosed. It appears to me that it is unavoidable, and all of Gods actions are a result of Him battling this evil and trying to end evil for all eternity. This is the path that God must take, there is no other path that will eradicate evil. So He is not omnipotent?
In that case, it becomes an issue of benevolence, right? If God has another choice, one that does not include suffering, but does not choose it, how do we call Him benevolent?No this is a path that God has chosen to take... There's nothing in the narrative that says he doesn't have any other choice. Now, I'm sure he has very good reasons for choosing to do it that way, but you're adding to the text, by saying it's unavoidable.
No this is a path that God has chosen to take... There's nothing in the narrative that says he doesn't have any other choice. Now, I'm sure he has very good reasons for choosing to do it that way, but you're adding to the text, by saying it's unavoidable.
The Problem of Evil had me reevaluate if I thought God was omnipotent. I no longer think He is.
First, I will cover the Zoroastrian idea of God, and then I will go through Biblical examples.
As a syncretist, I believe that Zoroastrianism provides an accurate depiction of God. The God of Zoroastrians, Ahura Mazda, is omniscient, benevolent, but not omnipotent. The central belief of Zoroastrianism is that Ahura Mazda is in a cosmic battle between the evil god, Ahirman. Every persons actions and thoughts contributes to this cosmic battle, for better or worse. God needs our help to overcome evil, so is not omnipotent in this way.
Now to the Bible.
In the latter end of the book of Daniel, he is praying. He is praying for several weeks, as that’s how long it takes for him to get an answer. An angel eventually comes to where he is praying and apologizes, saying: “Sorry Daniel! God sent me on my way to you the second you started praying, but an evil spirit held me back for a few weeks!”
I remember as a kid, the pastor preached that this wasn’t proof that God wasn’t omnipotent, rather the amount of days was symbolic or something like that, I don’t remember completely. But I think this is proof of God’s omniscience, but lack of omnipotence.
Then there’s Jesus. Do you suppose that if another way was possible to save us, Jesus would have done it? The fact that Jesus was crucified, if we believe our God is benevolent, then surely that sacrifice must have been necessary. If that was the only available route to save man, is God omnipotent?
In the book of Revelations, it is prophesied that people in the Messianic Kingdom will rebel. Does God not have the power to prevent sin, even in heaven?
Do you believe that the God you believe is omnipotent? Why or why not?
Actually, it isn’t "heaven on earth", but rather the restoration of paradise on earth...where God intended humans to live in the first place. "Paradise" means a park-like garden.....it was God who created the blueprint for what he wanted the whole earth to look like. He encouraged them to "be fruitful and fill the earth"....but added that they were to "subdue" the land that was outside of the garden. Humans were designed for work....good satisfying work, and to be caretakers of this planet as they were to look after the environment and all the creatures who shared life with them. This is why we were "made in God's image" and granted free will....to act in God's behalf.at this point in the Biblical narrative, Jesus’s earthly kingdom already exists. Heaven on Earth, yet evil must be let loosed.
It appears to me that it is unavoidable, and all of Gods actions are a result of Him battling this evil and trying to end evil for all eternity. This is the path that God must take, there is no other path that will eradicate evil. So He is not omnipotent?
Nothing can be omnipotent while you (or anything else) exists.
Omnipotence is unlimited power. Power is energy divided by time.
To have unlimited power implies infinite energy.
In a closed system energy or mass cannot be created or destroyed but can be changed from one to the other.
Matter (mass), you and i, earth, every planet, sun, asteroid, speck of space dust that exists in this universe is made from energy, thus reducing the amount of available energy. So energy even if it were infinite is no longer infinite.
Hence no god can have infinite power.
Logically, there are things an otherwise omnipotent being can't do. For example [he] can't occupy the same reality as another omnipotent being; hence [he] can't make a perfect copy of [him]self.The Problem of Evil had me reevaluate if I thought God was omnipotent. I no longer think He is.
First, I will cover the Zoroastrian idea of God, and then I will go through Biblical examples.
As a syncretist, I believe that Zoroastrianism provides an accurate depiction of God. The God of Zoroastrians, Ahura Mazda, is omniscient, benevolent, but not omnipotent. The central belief of Zoroastrianism is that Ahura Mazda is in a cosmic battle between the evil god, Ahirman. Every persons actions and thoughts contributes to this cosmic battle, for better or worse. God needs our help to overcome evil, so is not omnipotent in this way.
Now to the Bible.
In the latter end of the book of Daniel, he is praying. He is praying for several weeks, as that’s how long it takes for him to get an answer. An angel eventually comes to where he is praying and apologizes, saying: “Sorry Daniel! God sent me on my way to you the second you started praying, but an evil spirit held me back for a few weeks!”
I remember as a kid, the pastor preached that this wasn’t proof that God wasn’t omnipotent, rather the amount of days was symbolic or something like that, I don’t remember completely. But I think this is proof of God’s omniscience, but lack of omnipotence.
Then there’s Jesus. Do you suppose that if another way was possible to save us, Jesus would have done it? The fact that Jesus was crucified, if we believe our God is benevolent, then surely that sacrifice must have been necessary. If that was the only available route to save man, is God omnipotent?
In the book of Revelations, it is prophesied that people in the Messianic Kingdom will rebel. Does God not have the power to prevent sin, even in heaven?
Do you believe that the God you believe is omnipotent? Why or why not?
When you say “would not be easy”, it makes me think. For an omnipotent being, any task, such as extinguishing evil and redeeming mankind, would simply be a task, not an easy or hard. The fact that God had to do this specific thing, sacrifice a Messiah. Do you believe that God could have redeemed mankind another way? If so, then I can see the omnipotence. But if sacrificing Jesus was the only option, then I think that implies that God is omniscient in the way of Zoroastrianism, not omnipotent.Eradicating evil, once it was 'out of the box' (where God had it safely locked away so that no evil would ever befall his children) would not be easy as laws had been broken and God's perfect justice demanded certain actions. This included sending a savior, who would redeem humans out of this situation.
Its a shame that you have never bothered to get to really get to know this God, and what he first intended for the life he created on this planet.....or you could never make those statements as if you know more that he does.....or that you would never do what he has done....because there is always an end result that God will achieve, where the end always justifies the means......apparently you have no idea what the intended "end" is, or why God did things the way he did. And if you don't know why God allows death to overtake us, then you have no understanding of why it is permitted.Logically, there are things an otherwise omnipotent being can't do. For example [he] can't occupy the same reality as another omnipotent being; hence [he] can't make a perfect copy of [him]self.
Of course if you're omnipotent, perhaps logical restrictions don't apply to you, and you can do anything you like.
But the greatest demonstration of God's lack of omnipotence is happening at this very second and has happened in all the preceding seconds ─ that God never says and never does.
Nor does prayer alter anything ─ does not avert war, banish Covid, prevent congenital defects, cure cancer, reduce the road toll, nothing ─ unless it cheers someone up for a moment, but you can do that with a well-made coffee.
And I've never understood how an omnipotent benevolent moral being can sit on [his] hands and watch eg a small child drown in a swimming pool. That's not my morality ─ which says, if you can help, you help.
If you mean the Abrahamic God, I've read quite a bit about [him]. [He] has [his] own book, you know, the Tanakh. Let me put it this way ─ [his] values are vastly different from mine.Its a shame that you have never bothered to get to really get to know this God
I suspect I know more than [he] does if the bible is any guide. [He] thinks the earth is flat, for example, and that fruiting trees existed before the sun did.and what he first intended for the life he created on this planet.....or you could never make those statements as if you know more that he does.....
A lot of that is not wishing to do what [he]'s done ─ it's not on my agenda to tell my friends, relatives or employees to sacrifice their firstborn son to me, nor to engage in invasive war, nor human sacrifice (nor animal sacrifice, for that matter), nor slavery, nor to treat women as property, nor to indulge in murderous religious intolerance, nor ...or that you would never do what he has done....
You have no way of demonstrating that anything of the kind is true, no? It's fair to say that's just an excuse for the way bad things keep happening under the nose of a God billed as all-knowing, all-powerful and all-loving, no?because there is always an end result that God will achieve, where the end always justifies the means
If there's an "intended end", why have the people of the subcontinent and Asia never been told of it? Are they to be exterminated to make way for the "intended end"?......apparently you have no idea what the intended "end" is, or why God did things the way he did.
I know what death is and why. I know intimately that death is individually very painful, because of the way humans bond, but in fact death gives meaning to life; and imagine if people from the Iron Age were still living, some of them running for public office and others living on the public purse for thousands and thousands of years, nah!And if you don't know why God allows death to overtake us, then you have no understanding of why it is permitted.