Kowalski
Active Member
Yes, E=Mc2 is the most beautiful equation, its elegance is part of its perfection, so in that sense, god is indeed perfect.pandamonk said:This is carried on from the "God Debate"
Cheers,
K
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Yes, E=Mc2 is the most beautiful equation, its elegance is part of its perfection, so in that sense, god is indeed perfect.pandamonk said:This is carried on from the "God Debate"
And i can think of one greater than yours. One which does not need to want, things just happenAqualung said:Then yes, he is perfect. If you can conceive a being that cannot have a want, I can conceive one that is greater - One that can have a want.
The definition that you give is for "infinite."pandamonk said:Perfect - Than which nothing greater can be conceived.
Thta's not greater, though. I don't think it is a sign of un-greatness to want things. I think it is a greater sign of greatness.pandamonk said:And i can think of one greater than yours. One which does not need to want, things just happen
So are you saying you can think of something greater than perfection?lilithu said:The definition that you give is for "infinite."
Dude, yes! I can think of a perfect circle, absolutely perfect with no flaws detracting from its circularness. And yet, I can think of something greater than that circle. Perfection and size are not the same. Nor is perfection inherently good.pandamonk said:So are you saying you can think of something greater than perfection?
Great does not have to mean size. Like saying "the mona lisa is a great painting". This does not mean that it is a very big painting, as it is not, in this case it means that it is a very good painting.lilithu said:Dude, yes! I can think of a perfect circle, absolutely perfect with no flaws detracting from its circularness. And yet, I can think of something greater than that circle. Perfection and size are not the same. Nor is perfection inherently good.
"Nor is perfection inherently good."pandamonk said:Great does not have to mean size. Like saying "the mona lisa is a great painting". This does not mean that it is a very big painting, as it is not, in this case it means that it is a very good painting.
I did not say that perfection was inherently good.I said it was "Than which nothing greater can be conceived." I did not say "greater in goodness", i said greater, be it greatest stupidity or whatever. The rest was assumed by everyone else, including you.lilithu said:"Nor is perfection inherently good."
Bingo!! Give that lady a cigar!Meesheltx said:It is true that perfection is not inherently good. But I think a more appropriate question would be, is God perfectly good?
Yes, good question, but i started this post as we, in the God debate, were debating about a perfect god, and then came the question, "why does God have to be perfect anyway?"(or something along those lines)Meesheltx said:It is true that perfection is not inherently good. But I think a more appropriate question would be, is God perfectly good?
Dude, now you're going back to the size thing! Look, greater either means bigger (size), which you said two posts ago that it doesn't, or it means better (goodness), which you're saying now that it doesn't. Which one is it?pandamonk said:I did not say that perfection was inherently good.I said it was "Than which nothing greater can be conceived." I did not say "greater in goodness", i said greater, be it greatest stupidity or whatever. The rest was assumed by everyone else, including you.
Well saidKowalski said:All this stuff, is god this, is god that, groundless speculation speculation. Empirically, God is nothing but the laws of physics.......Bring on your God, let your God show itself, where is your God ? I suggest only in your collective heads, there is no reality in God, God is Illusion, Maya, Nothing. No-Thing.
Cheers
K
It means both, depending on the context(i can't believe i just said that, lol, i sound like a Christian). It is a proper definition, not the. Like i said before, "can you think of anything greater than perfection", with all meanings of greater?lilithu said:Dude, now you're going back to the size thing! Look, greater either means bigger (size), which you said two posts ago that it doesn't, or it means better (goodness), which you're saying now that it doesn't. Which one is it?
Either way, "that which nothing greater can be conceived" is not the proper definition for "perfect."
I already gave you an example of where I can think of something "greater," with both meanings of "greater." Are you saying that you can't think of anything "greater" than a perfect circle? Perfection by itself is not an attribute; it is only the measure of an attribute. Without a specified attribute, "perfect" makes no sense. "Wholly perfect" and "Perfectly perfect" sound nice but are meaningless.pandamonk said:It means both, depending on the context(i can't believe i just said that, lol, i sound like a Christian). It is a proper definition, not the. Like i said before, "can you think of anything greater than perfection", with all meanings of greater?