• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Is God pro-abortion?

leroy

Well-Known Member
Since one of our Christian members has been posting DarkMatter2525 videos recently I thought that I would beat him to the punch with this one:


Though very satirical it does lay out a good case that if anything the Bible is pro-abortion. Anyone care to watch the video and comment?
This article answers to the points made in the video:

Numbers 5 and Abortion: Does the Old Testament Law Condone Abortion?

But anyway, I am against abortion because I am against killing innocent people, If I were to choose between the doctrine of divine inspiration and being pro-life I would keep pro-life and drop the bible. ….
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
This article answers to the points made in the video:

Numbers 5 and Abortion: Does the Old Testament Law Condone Abortion?

But anyway, I am against abortion because I am against killing innocent people, If I were to choose between the doctrine of divine inspiration and being pro-life I would keep pro-life and drop the bible. ….
Answers in Genesis?? That is your source? Known lying sources are worthless in debates.

EDIT: I did check out the article and it was typical of AiG, exceedingly poor. Rather than finding a scholar that understood the language and the euphemisms of the time they relied on the number of translations that used the term "miscarriage". They reasoned since there are fewer of them they must be wrong. That was about it. There is always a chance that the outliers are correct, and when one investigates euphemisms and usages of that time it appears that they were.
 
Last edited:

leroy

Well-Known Member
Answers in Genesis?? That is your source? Known lying sources are worthless in debates.
Sure ignore the source, as I said i am prolife independently of what the bible has to say…………so to me personally its irrelevant whether if the YouTube cartoon is true or not

I simply provided the source, just in case you are interested in knowing how christians typically respond........
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Sure ignore the source, as I said i am prolife independently of what the bible has to say…………so to me personally its irrelevant whether if the YouTube cartoon is true or not

I simply provided the source, just in case you are interested in knowing how christians typically respond........
I did not ignore the source. But you need to vet your sources. Known lying sources are useless in a debate. That is the way that credibility works. By using such a source you admit that you have nothing. Here is a helpful hint, you can use a lying source for an idea, but you need to confirm it somewhere else. That means using real scholars, not apologetics sites. Sadly all of them appear to be Liars for Jesus. I am not saying that believing in Jesus is proven wrong, but if you can only find liars that support you your position looks very very weak.

Like it or not the YouTube cartoon is far more accurate than the source that you used to refute it.
 

leroy

Well-Known Member
I did not ignore the source. But you need to vet your sources. Known lying sources are useless in a debate. That is the way that credibility works.
You source is a cartoon from youtube.....from a fanatic atheist that makes a living out of making fun out of religion.....your source is not much better than mine

Like it or not the YouTube cartoon is far more accurate than the source that you used to refute it.
Maybe, but you have to support the assertion.... You have to actually show that my source is wrong and yours is true.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
You source is a cartoon from youtube.....from a fanatic atheist that makes a living out of making fun out of religion.....your source is not much better than mine


Maybe, but you have to support the assertion.... You have to actually show that my source is wrong and yours is true.

All I have to do is to bring up any of their Noah's Ark articles. That alone shows their dishonesty. Or Incompetence. You lose either way.
 

McBell

Unbound
All I have to do is to bring up any of their Noah's Ark articles. That alone shows their dishonesty. Or Incompetence. You lose either way.
IMO the second someone references AIG, you know they they are either to ignorant to have an honest discussion with, or they are to dishonest to have an honest discussion with.

What really made me chuckle is that he complains about your "fanatic" video right after referencing AIG.
 

1213

Well-Known Member
So you are saying that anyone pro-abortion is for the abortion of all pregnancies? Do you really think that? Why?

Why not, if one thinks abortion is good, why would he not think it is good in every case? Maybe people are not logical in this and because the question is about God, I think the question should be, why would God abort only some, but not all, if He would be pro-abortion? If there is only some that should be aborted, it is not really about being pro-abortion, but about pro-killing people that are not good in the killer’s eyes.
 

SeekingAllTruth

Well-Known Member
Being a deist, I believe God isn't even aware of nor could He care less how many or how few abortions a woman has. He's completely removed from this world and what goes on in it. I think that's apparent from the total lack of evidence that He is here or doing anything to benefit us.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Being a deist, I believe God isn't even aware of nor could He care less how many or how few abortions a woman has. He's completely removed from this world and what goes on in it. I think that's apparent from the total lack of evidence that He is here or doing anything to benefit us.
I should have qualified that I was referring to mainly the Christian God in the OP. Christians quite often try to claim that God is anti-abortion when the Bible never supports that claim and in fact refutes it in places.
 

SeekingAllTruth

Well-Known Member
Because “He is pro-abortion”. If He don’t abort all, he is actually pro-killing for certain people.
of course God is pro-abortion. He certainly is pro-stillborn. Let's do a little math: women in American have 24,000 stillborn deaths of babies each year. Statistically, 65% of the nation professes to be Christian. 24,000 stillborns x's 65% = 15,600 stillborns suffered by Christian woman who want a baby. God is definitely pro-stillborn.
 

SeekingAllTruth

Well-Known Member
I should have qualified that I was referring to mainly the Christian God in the OP. Christians quite often try to claim that God is anti-abortion when the Bible never supports that claim and in fact refutes it in places.
Yes, when we mention "God" we're referring to the Christian god and/or whatever higher intelligence is out there. Either one doesn't do a thing for people, that's pretty evident--even though Christians like to fool themselves into believe He/it does.
 

Kelly of the Phoenix

Well-Known Member
The Bible is not the final revelation of truth from God. Since then there has been more revelations appear which explain more fully God’s Will.
Well, I have a revelation and it's newer than yours: uterus owners do what they gotta do. If God doesn't like it, He's free to put a stop to it.

At a time when there were no prisons such as in a desert environment penalties ranged from cutting of hands to stoning to death.
And never any rules that would keep people from feeling the need to do criminal behavior, which is often from desperation.
 
Top