• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Is it okay to have sex at an early age?

Buttercup

Veteran Member
nutshell said:
Dr. Drew should be able to say something about males or females without always having to provide an equal statement regarding the opposite sex.
Nutshell.....you seem to be missing my entire point. The statements relayed by these two are FALSE. That is my whole beef entirely....we can leave boys out of it as far as I'm concerned.
 

Sunstone

De Diablo Del Fora
Premium Member
Nutshell, would you seriously have us believe that telling a girl her vagina will soon enough look 40 years old is "saving her from a life of self destructive behavior". Do you think it might be possible for a medical doctor to attempt the salvation of a young woman without resorting to distortions or even lies?
 

nutshell

Well-Known Member
Buttercup said:
Nutshell.....you seem to be missing my entire point. The statements relayed by these two are FALSE. That is my whole beef entirely....we can leave boys out of it as far as I'm concerned.

You're missing my whole point...you called him to the carpet because he didn't make an equal statement about males. Revisit your original response if you have to.
 

nutshell

Well-Known Member
Sunstone said:
Nutshell, would you seriously have us believe that telling a girl her vagina will soon enough look 40 years old is "saving her from a life of self destructive behavior". Do you think it might be possible for a medical doctor to attempt the salvation of a young woman without resorting to distortions or even lies?

As I mentioned. You'd have to see the whole conversation in context.
 

Buttercup

Veteran Member
nutshell said:
You're missing my whole point...you called him to the carpet because he didn't make an equal statement about males. Revisit your original response if you have to.
Agreed. I had two points I made in that first post. One about stereotyping females and not males. And another about his statements being false. Since that post, I have chosen to focus on the point that is more important to me.....his propagating the untrue rumor of females aging quicker if they engage in early sex. That is a false statement and one that I vehemently disagree with.
 

Sunstone

De Diablo Del Fora
Premium Member
nutshell said:
As I mentioned. You'd have to see the whole conversation in context.
I'm curious, Nutshell. If Dr. Drew's statement can only be understood "in context", as you claim, then why did you bother to bring it up in the first place? That is why interject something you knew could not be understood except in context into a discussion? I'm puzzled here.
 

nutshell

Well-Known Member
Apparently I'm being "rude and inflammatory" so I guess I shouldn't participate in this discussion right now.
 

Sunstone

De Diablo Del Fora
Premium Member
*sigh* I guess I'm going to have to feel guilt about my ex wife wearing out her vagina at an early age. The odd thing about it is she's the daughter of two practicing doctors and the sister of a third, and not one of those kindly physicians was kind enough to warn her she was wearing it out. I wonder why? :confused:
 

Faint

Well-Known Member
Maybe Dr. Drew's point is that sex at an early age wears down most girls inside, and it becomes noticeable on the outside? I know Drew doesn't always speak in medical terms, and I've found his advice to be wise and well thought out. I'd like to hear the overall context.

I would agree that promiscuity beginning when a girl is young is often detectable based on looks alone. I can easily spot the "loose/fast" women/girls in any social event. It's subtleties in the way they look at you, the way they move, the way they carry themselves. Sometimes this "****-symptoms" are not so subtle. The saying "young in years but old in sin" applies. They no longer look innocent...more like someone who has been around the block a few times (which is generally reserved for 40 year-olds with life experience).
 

Buttercup

Veteran Member
Faint said:
more like someone who has been around the block a few times (which is generally reserved for 40 year-olds with life experience).
I think I need to abstain from replying any further in this thread.....The comments being made are so insulting I'm afraid of where my input might lead.
 

Sunstone

De Diablo Del Fora
Premium Member
Buttercup said:
I think I need to abstain from replying any further in this thread.....The comments being made are so insulting I'm afraid of where my input might lead.

I agree. That was extremely callous and deserving of an apology.
 

Fluffy

A fool
I would agree that promiscuity beginning when a girl is young is often detectable based on looks alone. I can easily spot the "loose/fast" women/girls in any social event. It's subtleties in the way they look at you, the way they move, the way they carry themselves. Sometimes this "****-symptoms" are not so subtle. The saying "young in years but old in sin" applies. They no longer look innocent...more like someone who has been around the block a few times (which is generally reserved for 40 year-olds with life experience).

Are you saying that from the "sluts are evil evil creatures" point of view or the "meh they aren't hurting anyone so kudos to them but it ain't for me" point of view?
 

Mike182

Flaming Queer
i've read parts of this thread, bu ti'm going to just address the OP

Lotta said:
Or will you be going against the word of god, I mean after constanine butchered the bible, I really have no idea what the right way is.

Discuss.

is sex at an early age wrong?

i don't think any consentual sex is wrong.

i also do not think sex at an early age demeans any relationships later on in life
 

nutshell

Well-Known Member
Mike182 said:
i've read parts of this thread, bu ti'm going to just address the OP



is sex at an early age wrong?

i don't think any consentual sex is wrong.

i also do not think sex at an early age demeans any relationships later on in life

How about consentual sex between a 14 year old girl and a 40 year old man?
 

Ðanisty

Well-Known Member
So, are we trying to say that using parts of the body wears them out? If so, maybe I shouldn't draw so much...I might wear out my hands. And I probably shouldn't read so much because I sure don't want to wear out my eyes. Can you see where this is going?

Body parts are designed the way they are for a reason, so unless you do something with a part that it was not designed to do, I don't think anyone's going to wear out any faster than anyone else. If you keep in mind that the vagina was designed to give birth, I don't think you have to worry about what the average penis can do.
 

Circle_One

Well-Known Member
Also Danisty, you have to remember, you also shouldn't NOT use your body parts for lengthy periods of time either. I mean, just look at the Tyrannasaurus Rex! Poor gimpy little arms and all.

Anyway, I think that whole rumor that having sex at an early age wears a vagina out is just overly preposterous. Mine is still beautifully intact, thank you very much :p



Was that out of line?
 

Buttercup

Veteran Member
Circle_One said:
Anyway, I think that whole rumor that having sex at an early age wears a vagina out is just overly preposterous. Mine is still beautifully intact, thank you very much :p



Was that out of line?
LMAO! No of course not. And may I add that you don't look haggard and aged either.
 

egroen

Member
The "wearing out of the vagina" is the most ridiculous thing I have heard in some time. In fact, the opposite is true.

Sex, will literally keep your entire body feeling and looking younger:

Sex helps increase the blood flow to your brain and to all other organs of your body. Increased heart rate and deep breathing accounts for the improvement in circulation. As fresh blood supply arrives, your cells, organs and muscles are saturated with fresh oxygen and hormones, and as the used blood is removed, you also remove waste products that cause fatigue and even illness.

Sex helps lower the overall cholesterol level. Perhaps more importantly it tips the HDL/LDL (good/bad) cholesterol balance towards the healthier HDL side.

With arousal and orgasm oxytocin levels rise. They spike 3 to 5 times higher than usual just before orgasm. In fact it is oxytocin that triggers the orgasm and is an incredible pain reliever.

Endorphin levels increase which is a natural mood elevator and strees reliever.

The hormone DHEA promotes sexual excitement and increases in response to it. DHEA helps balance the immune system, improves cognition, promotes bone growth, and maintains and repairs tissues, keeping your skin healthy and supple. It may also contribute to cardiovascular health and even function as antidepressant.

Regular sexual activity boosts testosterone and estrogen levels in both men and women. Besides boosting your libido testosterone fortifies bones and muscles. Some physicians suggest that testosterone keeps hearts healthy and good cholesterol high. Sex increases women’s estrogen levels keeping vaginal tissues more supple and also protecting against heart disease.

-Erin
 

Mercy Not Sacrifice

Well-Known Member
I too sense real sexism in this notion that sex wears out the vagina. Apparently giving birth, which is exponentially harder on the female body, does not. But then again, it's a woman's "duty" to give birth, so it just can't be that bad for her, right? :sarcastic
 
Top