Alright, thanks for clearing that up.I mean that which we believe or understand to be good (regardless of what form it may take).
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Alright, thanks for clearing that up.I mean that which we believe or understand to be good (regardless of what form it may take).
Yet again you make this bold empty claim.The atheist could, but the bottom line remains the same: It is not possible for us to create a purpose without acting on some higher purpose (which we ourselves did not create).
Well, since we evolved a survival instinct and an instinct to multiply our purpose is obviously to survive and perpetuate the species.
Much of your audience (including myself) is just not getting this point.It is not possible for us to create a purpose without acting on some higher purpose (which we ourselves did not create).
I have that same problem. I don't know if it's just me, but the majority of his "X entails Y" arguments don't make much sense to me.Much of your audience (including myself) is just not getting this point.
And your source for this statement is . . . ?It is not possible for us to create a purpose without acting on some higher purpose (which we ourselves did not create).
Evolution gave you the survival instinct and the instinct to procreate. You just followed your instincts.
Of course it is. We create our own reality through our experience/perception. Purpose isn't any different.Many atheists are inclined to argue that the only purpose we have is that which we create for ourselves. But creating a purpose qualifies as a purpose in and of itself. IOW, whatever is driving the atheist to create a purpose is itself a purpose which the atheist him- or herself did not create.
Question: Is it possible for us to create a purpose without acting on some higher purpose (which we ourselves did not create)?
"The good is what all desire." - St. Thomas Aquinas
I agree that we should all seek for things to be used for good and that is most likely our purpose in life, to look out for the good of the species, but it's not because God wants us to. We're intrinsically good on our own.
Says you.
You keep repeating this mantra but have not shown it to be true.
Are you going to support your claim?This does not qualify as any sort of counterargument.
I am not presenting a counter argument.This does not qualify as any sort of counterargument.
Money. ...which is also a higher purpose.What would be the purpose of the manipulation?
What is the higher purpose?Self-interest - greed, lust, etc.
The same argument is put forth by those claiming man does everything in his own self-interest. Self-interest is the higher purpose in that argument. The trouble with both the good and self-interest arguments is that purpose is assigned. Given some thought, the same argument can be made with other assigned variables.As I see it. every purpose you believe you have created during the course of your life was subordinated to a higher purpose, namely, the purpose to seek the good. This is so self-evident that it hardly needs to be stated.
Yes, I am saying the intention to create a purpose requires a higher purpose in order to account for the intention. And you're not saying anything to refute that argument.
It is possible, but quite unlikely to happen.Many atheists are inclined to argue that the only purpose we have is that which we create for ourselves. But creating a purpose qualifies as a purpose in and of itself. IOW, whatever is driving the atheist to create a purpose is itself a purpose which the atheist him- or herself did not create.
Question: Is it possible for us to create a purpose without acting on some higher purpose (which we ourselves did not create)?
"The good is what all desire." - St. Thomas Aquinas