@siti
[N.B. Better not to read my message here, because I am into hyperbole, still the substance of my thought is clear and relevant in regard to the title of this thread,
Is it possible to talk with an atheist, or a wannabee atheist?]
@ALL readers and posters, in particular folks who think on reason and observation as to come to intelligent conclusion, instead of behaving so smugly arrogant as to not even realize that they are talking all inside their brain, and when outside their brain they are mindless, because they live with chimps and have one for an avatar, and with mice, one of which is all inside their brain namely Mickey Mouse.
Dear siti, please do not run away and again throwing a stink bomb on the way to the exit.
Return, because I like very much to tell you that you are so smugly arrogant with your narrow brain reach, but you never go into the objective world of babies at home and roses in the garden and the moon in the evening sky and the sun in the morning sky.
Please, siti, try to look into yourself, and see whether you are not all the time into a most awful psychological condition of smug arrogance, and nothing of any genuine cognitive depth and substance.
Dear readers and posters here, siti is no different from atheists whose only argument against God existing in concept as the creator of everything with a beginning, is to insult God with ridiculous groundless analogies, like with siti in his smugly arrogant brain, with comparing God to Mickey Mouse.
In that groundless comparison siti has already proven to his own smug arrogant heart and brain that he is just viable only to talk with chimps and mice, but nothing else of genuine human reasoning on observation as to come to intelligent conclusion, on the reality of God existing in concept as the creator of everything with a beginning.
Do you notice, dear readers and posters here, that with atheists which I see siti to be emulating to fit into, it is all ridiculous insults to God with them atheists; I tend to think siti is one for adopting also the perverse attitude of no thinking at all but all hurling insults with absurd analogies against God, Who is in concept the creator of everything with a beginning.
Dear readers and posters here, let us sit back and witness whether siti has the intellectual guts to return and continue our exchange, or he is inanely happy to stay away and continue to nurse his vacuous - shame to him - hot foul stench of smug arrogance.
There, that is, forgive me though, my assessment of siti, he with a chimp for an avatar and living with monkeys and mice, but so pretentious as to dwell in smug arrogance that he can write in a net forum, when all he can do is to think up nonsense thoughts all inside his brain only.
Again, that is for comic relief, but didactic I hope reading for siti, in aid of self-examination by himself of his cognitive inanity and vacuity.
And don’t imitate me, dear readers and posters here, in my comic relief.
But do read and think on reason and observation as to reach intelligent conclusion, on any issue of genuine relevance in our search for pure gold wisdom on the default status of things in the totality of reality which is existence.
Annex
@siti
The difference between Mickey Mouse in your concept is that it makes people laugh; but in my concept of God, God is the creator of everything with a beginning.
Dear readers and posters here:
I want to tell you again, that this is my precise and concise concept of God in clear simple language:
"In concept God is the creator of everything with a beginning."
And here again in concise and precise clear simple language is my proof from evidence of God existing in concept as the creator of everything with a beginning, see below in Annex.
Now, people who do not think on reason and observation as to come to intelligent conclusion, on evidence that God exists, in concept as the creator of everything with a beginning, they should just keep to the company of monkeys and mice and flying spaghetti monsters and invisible pink unicorns and teapots orbiting in space, also tooth fairies, but please do not write in an internet forum.
Dear readers and posters here, do you know the distinction between the objectival realm and the conceptival realm?
Concepts like Mickey Mouse that makes people laughs, that Mickey Mouse, it is in the conceptival realm, i.e. in the brain of siti, or presumably also in his mind because there be humans who have brain but are mindless, in which case they are like siti at home with monkeys and mice viz. in siti's objectival realm.
That is for comic relief though it is also didactic for humans who live with monkeys and mice as to have an ape for an avatar, and think Mickey Mouse when the conversation is about God in concept the creator of everything with a beginning.
Before I forget, also, dear readers and posters here, think about what is a valid concept as opposed to an invalid concept.
From Sanmario
Proof from evidence of God existing in concept as the creator of everything with a beginning.
1. Enunciate the concept of God, namely, in concept God is the creator of everything with a beginning.
2. I go to the realm of existence to look for everything with a beginning.
3. I see everything with my eyes and I experience everything I meet as for example the babies at home and the roses in the garden, and everything else, you mention it, it has a beginning.
4. So, there are everything with a beginning that we are living with and in and within.
5. They are evidence of God existing in concept as creator of everything with a beginning.
6. Conclusion from evidence: God exists in concept as creator of everything with a beginning.
#235 Sanmario,
Yesterday at 5:06 PM
