I voted yes, though there may be only one accurate side to said story.
What makes the stories different is individual subjectivity during data collection and your method of data collection. For example, in politics, one may have a subjective bias, one way or the other. Therefore you cannot use some data, about the other side, if it would undermine your own subjective belief or bias. For example, a Liberal would have a hard time admitting Trump had a good economy before COVID. This data has to be omitted or else you shoot yourself in the foot. The story will be different.
In science, when you collect data, you plot it on a graph, and then draw the best curve. In the example above, the Trump economy data will be missing or even plotted differently; fake news, to benefit your position. This changes the graph by which we reason.
In modern times, since birds of a feather flock together, if one only gets news from biased sources, this limited data is the data you plot. This can all be good data, but it is not all the good data. Partial good data can impact the best curve based on logic and inference.
Another data collection aspect has to do with subjective data frequency. For example, if an airliner was to crash, this will be played over and over until it become this huge data point the size of a bowling ball. This one point can drown out all the less frequent data points and alter the angle of the entire curve; add irrational fear out of proportion with reality.
Advertisers tend to use the bowling ball of desire instead of fear. They use the repeat cycle, and target their audience; easiest to bias.
There is also misinformation and disinformation, like the Russian Collusion Coup and the Russian Disinformation laptop scams. These bad data, via so-called experts and fake news, will populate sound reasoning curves with bad data, which when reasoned, will lead one down a rabbit hole. Many are still down there and can't get out. It may still seem real, based on sounding reasoning, unaware of bad data.
There are many ways, one can game the system, knowing that there is more than one side to a story; propaganda.