Desert Snake
Veteran Member
People talk about Jesus referring to the 'father', in the Scriptures, is Jesus separate from the father?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Yes. Divinity debate or?People talk about Jesus referring to the 'father', in the Scriptures, is Jesus separate from the father?
People talk about Jesus referring to the 'father', in the Scriptures, is Jesus separate from the father?
Yes. Divinity debate or?
Why did you ask?Sure, if you want.
Because there seems to be different opinions on this, even between Xians, I believe. So, I'm gauging the average beliefs concerning this with a poll.Why did you ask?
Em. Well my position remains the same. Jesus is separate from the Father. He's not the Father. (Side with JW)Because there seems to be different opinions on this, even between Xians, I believe. So, I'm gauging the average beliefs concerning this with a poll.
Is there some reason for this?Em. Well my position remains the same. Jesus is separate from the Father. He's not the Father. (Side with JW)
Is there some reason for this?
Jesus is a part of the Trinity. God The Father, Jesus Christ The Son, and The Holy Spirit are 3 in 1. Jesus is essentially God in the Flesh. They are three distinct person(s), but yet they are in one accord.
To answer the question NO Jesus is not the Father, because again they are 3 distinct person(s) in one accord. He IS God, but NOT the Father.
The Bible doesn't say that.
No trinity. No Jesus as God.
He claims to be the awaited Jewish Messiah, whom is a special sent HUMAN from the line of David.
*
Not in my Bible, good ole King James Version. Again that is your viewpoint in which I will not ever agree with as I am pretty positive the Bible clearly states NO man shall get to The Father but through Jesus.
You can insist that your interpretation trumps that of Christian orthodoxy all you want. You may think you know what you're talking about, but it's really unlikely that you have a compelling point that has been mysteriously 'missed' for two-thousand years.The Bible doesn't say that.
"Through" Jesus.Not in my Bible, good ole King James Version. Again that is your viewpoint in which I will not ever agree with as I am pretty positive the Bible clearly states NO man shall get to The Father but through Jesus.
Separate in person, but one in being.
You can insist that your interpretation trumps that of Christian orthodoxy all you want. You may think you know what you're talking about, but it's really unlikely that you have a compelling point that has been mysteriously 'missed' for two-thousand years.