questfortruth
Well-Known Member
It is statement, it is claim: "here are many gods of luck".Can i ask what you see as wrong with @Kelly of the Phoenix logic?
There is the proof of it?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
It is statement, it is claim: "here are many gods of luck".Can i ask what you see as wrong with @Kelly of the Phoenix logic?
If @Kelly of the Phoenix believe there are many Gods, and different gods for luck, then one would respect that belief of an other person, or?It is statement, it is claim: "here are many gods of luck".
There is the proof of it?
There is only scientific logic in the thread of mine.Just like other people would respect you, for your belief.
So why do you keep speaking about God, if all you want to discuss is science?There is only scientific logic in the thread of mine.
God's NAME is Science. God has many names.So why do you keep speaking about God, if all you want to discuss is science?
Thats the logic of yours i dont understand
Its a nameGod's NAME is Science. God has many names.
God is the very notion of Science. God is the defintion of Science. That is, Science is the Name of God.Its a name
You do know science is human made?God is the very notion of Science. God is the defintion of Science. That is, Science is the Name of God.
Love is emotion of human. I can meet my dream woman and feel love.You do know science is human made?
Do you see God as a human?
Oh...Love is emotion of human. I can meet my dream woman and feel love.
God is not love, but God is Spirit of Love. God is person-aficated Love, God is Love in person.
Same way, God is not Science, but God is Spirit of Scientific Research. This means, that God is so much Science, that His name is Science.
I feel love to my mom, when the God of Love touches my heart.Oh...
Who is the god of science?I feel love to my mom, when the God of Love touches my heart.
I am making discoveries in Math, when the God of Science enters my brain.
His Name is God. All religions know this name.Who is the god of science?
God is a title not a name of a God.His Name is God. All religions know this name.
If it is title, then where I get this title? But even the Trump was not called by word God. "God Trump"God is a title not a name of a God.
You want to be God?If it is title, then where I get this title? But even the Trump was not called by word God. "God Trump"
IS LUCK THE GOD?
I am, successful scientist Dmitri Martila, am asking you: God is Luck?
Please look my arguments for this "mind-blowing" idea.
Luck does not contradict the Science of Statistics, because the latter always allows very rare events - statistical wonders.
Recall Dr. Kurt Gödel's second incompleteness theorem: one cannot prove the consistency of Mathematics. And since there is only one answer possible “Mathematics is inconsistent”, then it is truly inconsistent. But Kurt has excluded Luck. Then his incompleteness theorem is not working, and Mathematics with Luck is consistent.
The quantum entanglement of two particles can be explained by using Luck. If we have measured the spin of the first particle +1, then we are lucky enough to measure the spin -1 of the second particle. However, the probability of the latter event is 50 %.
If we have the probability of an event (or effect) as 40% or 50%, but this event (or effect) must necessarily happen (or be there), then we are dealing with Luck. This could explain even the abiogenesis in Scientific terms. Or why an asteroid or comet will never destroy humankind: the Universe requires an intelligent observer. Hereby the observation is not necessarily actual, but the Universe is observable and detectable ``in principle'', or in a ``thought experiments''.
``If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound?'' is a philosophical thought experiment that raises questions regarding observation and perception. Then my paper proves the following answer: ``Yes''.
The “five sigma rule”, which was used to discover the Higgs Boson is the reliance on Luck. Why? It is scientific to accept beyond any doubt the existence of Higgs Boson (or any effect or particle in Particle Physics), if probability of mistake is less than that the five sigma-s give.
Random number generator gives probability of event A in one trial as 10%. But previous 1000 times was event B, not A happening. Hence, the expectancy, that in 1001-th time happens A is less than 1/1000 = 0.1 %. The difference between 0.1 % and 10% is explained by the influence of Luck (Bad, if A is desired, or Good if the A is not desired).
Consider the Fermi paradox: “absence of recordable life in cosmos, while the abiogenesis has to happen”. The romantic people look at night sky star systems and think, that the sky is full of life, because the chance for Earth to get alive were the same as chances for any suitable planet to bloom with living organisms. The Earth is alive, and Mars is dead only because the people are born on Earth. Consider 10 suitable for life planets, the Earth and Mars are among them. The current time is 4 000 000 000 BC. If it is given that there will be one single living planet in this group of planets with probability 30 %, then the probability that the Earth gets alive is exactly these 30 %. Because the humans can live only there, where they are born. But Mars has not this advantage, hence, the probability of Mars getting life is (1/10)*30%=3%. The difference between 3% and 30 % is explained by Luck. This solves the Fermi paradox.
You seem to be a reasonable person. So, I want to ask my friends: does Russia exist? There is difference between Presence and Existence. For example, Adolf Hitler is so much evil and satanic, that has lost the gift of Existence.