Mutual masturbation definition and meaning | Collins English DictionaryIf there is a partner involved, it's not masturbation, it's sex.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Mutual masturbation definition and meaning | Collins English DictionaryIf there is a partner involved, it's not masturbation, it's sex.
Of course its a form of sexual behavior, but that doesn't disqualify it as masturbation.If there is a partner involved, it's not masturbation, it's sex.
Your facts and figures make lying look pretty human, too. 78% over 14 say "they have masturbated at some point?" Then very close to 22% are not telling the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.Less than fully human?? Hell . . . .
"On average, 78 percent of all Americans age 14 and older say they have masturbated at some point in their lives, according to the NSSHB. When men in their 30s were asked whether they had masturbated alone at any point in their life, 93.4 percent said yes."
Looks pretty darn human to me.
Yeah, I found that pretty incredible myself. With no evidence whatsoever, I'd put the non-masturbators at <3%Your facts and figures make lying look pretty human, too. 78% over 14 say "they have masturbated at some point?" Then very close to 22% are not telling the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.
Which kind of suggests that there a lot of people out there who think self-pleasure is more sinful than lying. Being who I am, of course, I find that very peculiar.Yeah, I found that pretty incredible myself. With no evidence whatsoever, I'd put the non-masturbators at <3%
.
Dianna AndersonSo, where do you stand? Is masturbation an acceptable component to healthy sexuality for Christians?
Dianna Anderson is the author of the forthcoming
book, DAMAGED GOODS, out in Spring 2015
from Jericho Books. When she is not writing,
she is on the lookout for a new day job.
"Is masturbation an acceptable component to healthy sexuality?
Short answer: Yes. Long answer: Yes, absolutely. In fact, I might scratch "acceptable" from there and change it to "important."
Like sex itself, masturbation is sinful only insofar as you use it sinfully. And what counts as "sinfully" for one person may not be sinful for others. This, most of all, requires knowing and understanding yourself and what your limits are. If you don't feel comfortable masturbating because you feel like it takes you to a bad place where you objectify other people, then don't do it. We make mistakes in christendom when we assume that masturbation is problematic for some, so no one, ever, should do this private thing. That's a problem, because my lines about what is sinful are not your lines, and making you conform to my lines in something as intensely complicated as sexuality won't end well.
As far as it being a component of healthy sexuality, it can be a helpful tool for understanding yourself and what feels right and what doesn't before you ever enter into a sexual relationship. It can also make you more comfortable and more confident with your own body so that you are more comfortable when the time comes with a partner. Masturbation can be an important component of a healthy sexuality and can be an important part of a healthy sex life (if you're comfortable taking care of yourself, there's less pressure when you're with a partner). It can be misused and abused, like any good thing, certainly, but it can also be a great boon to understanding and becoming comfortable with yourself as well."
[This reply was edited for brevity]
Matthew Lee Anderson
Matthew Lee Anderson is the author of Earthen
Vessels: Why our Bodies Matter to our Faith and
The End of our Exploring:A Book about Questioning
and the Confidence of Faith.
"If our ethic is to be Christian, then it must be qualified by the cross and resurrection of Jesus. That is to say, the pattern for our lives and actions must be shaped by a love that treats pleasure as the (sometimes delayed) fruit of our sacrificial self-giving for others, rather than a good without qualification.
If we disconnect the experience of sexual pleasure from the moment of giving ourselves for another, to another in love, we fundamentally distort the meaning of the human body in its sexual dimension. In the auto-eroticism of masturbation, we pursue a particular sort of satisfaction or a particular experience of pleasure. But it is through the mutual self-giving in love that our humanity is established (whether in sex or beyond), rather than the abstract experience of pleasure or the fulfillment of a craving or felt need. However enjoyable it might be, masturbation fails to fulfill this form of human sexuality, and as such is corrosive to the integrity of our persons and our intimacy of the Spirit.
SOURCE
.
Aaand the sarcasm flew over Frank's head.Condoms are "sick"? What?
*
The Bible does not actually condemn masturbation.
I don't know where people come up with the idea of it being wrong, or a sin.
*
I find it interesting that the Woman says yes and the Man says no. Accordingly the Catholic church(Largest Christian organization) would agree with both. It is the wasting of semen that is the problem, in female masturbation there is no wasting. The ovum is not effected.
When one gets down to the struggles humans endure god could have done a thousand things better and still preserved their sinful nature. But evidently undo suffering and penny-ante sins such as masturbation amuse him. Go figure, this god who is worthy of praise and adoration. I sure can't.If masturbation is "wrong" or "sinful" in the eyes of "The Creator", then it stands to reason that He/She/It would have created us without the ability to masturbate. There really isn't an automated way to stop humans from harming one another physically, nor is there a way to control people from cheating on their partner, nor some way to make stealing a physical impossibility. However, there are all sorts of examples of bodily functions that occur via a "lock and key" instantiation method. Certain chemical prerequisites must be met, or "X" function of the body doesn't occur. Melatonin inducing a feeling of sleepiness - letting you know when your body needs to rest, for instance. Antibodies and antigens as another example. The taste-buds on your tongue only activating and sending their signals out if the appropriate type of "taste" has come in contact with them. Not all "perfectly" analogous by what I am about to describe, but close enough to know it should be possible. I'm sure better analogies exist in the animal kingdom (if not the exact sort of scenario), I just don't know what they are.
Anyway, "God" should have been able to create the male human body such that sperm didn't find release until it had come in proximity of the cervical opening. Thus eliminating the ability for masturbation (Well, the male form at least) altogether.
This is why it's so amusing when preachers get caught with their pants down---those cases involving children excepted.It often seems that the religious folks who push the most puritanical views of sex always end up being the ones with the most kinky sh** going in secret. It's kind of a form of the "you smelt it, you dealt it," theory of flatulence.
From experience, I always assume such people are major perverts, and the rest of their profile generally fits the bill.
On average, 78 percent of all Americans age 14 and older say they have masturbated at some point in their lives, according to the NSSHB.
If there is a partner involved, it's not masturbation, it's sex.
At the end of the article there are two places listed you can go to that may give you your answer:I would like to see evidence that "all Americans" were included in the survey.
To be honest there text should have read
"On average, 78 percent of xxxx Americans surveyed, age 14 and older..."
Pedantic i know but if i see a lie i discount the post.
At the end of the article there are two places listed you can go to that may give you your answer:
Out of curiosity, are you thinking the percentage should be higher or lower? Or are you simply curious as to the size of the sample?
.