There's always ProgressivePunch.Thanks. I'm a little cautious about Vox since I've been burned by them in the past, but that particular article jives with what I've read elsewhere.
The Kamala Harris pick will attract/energize many. It will disturb/dismay others (on both the left and the right). Racism, male chauvinism, and identity politics will largely determine the net regional result, while the distortion imposed by our electoral college system will determine the import of these regional results. The calculus of all this is beyond me, but I suspect that the gains will outweigh the looses.On a personal level, I find much to admire about Ms. Harris, as well as somethings I do not admire. My point, however, is that she seems a net liability candidate when it comes to appealing to certain groups, and that perhaps Mr. Biden could have done better -- especially had he found a more progressive partner.
At the same time, I can think of nothing so dangerous at this time than is framing the good as the enemy of the perfect. Both Biden and Harris could have been far more progressive in the past. Much the same could be said of Obama. So we keep up the pressure. Such is politics. But the fact remains, a Biden/Harris regime will represent an immense qualitative improvement.
I'll be 75 in September. I'm bless with a wonderful wife, kids, and grandkids, and this November I'll likely cast the most important vote in my life.