NathantheProfit
Member
It seems to me that concluding that an individual's trajectory is fixed because, in theory, all the laws that effect consciousness are fixed is a logical fallacy. Consciousness is different enough to non-consciousness (if there is such a thing) to open the possibility for it to operate by alternate- yet still potentially natural- rules. Saying consciousness is purely the effect of external causes and therefore its destiny is fixed is like concluding that there is no other life in the universe because we have not yet found any. At the very least, the possibility still exists. And as long as the argument for it is not a logical absurdity, it should remain equally as possible as an alternate theory that is also logically coherent yet still unproven (for those who will refer to neurological studies to point to freewill being an illusion, I just want to say that although I'm not going to go into it, I'm not convinced by those studies. But feel free to bring them up). I am not trying to appeal to randomness. I know randomness doesn't infer freedom. I am appealing to the still widely still unknown nature of reality, and thus the open possibility for something that is not an inherent logical absurdity (freewill) to abide within.
To conclude with the title of this thread: Do you think the when, where, and how of your inevitable death is fixed in stone? In addition, if you think that because the universe is indeterministic that your death is also indeterministic, how is this compatible with the view that consciousness is predetermined?
To conclude with the title of this thread: Do you think the when, where, and how of your inevitable death is fixed in stone? In addition, if you think that because the universe is indeterministic that your death is also indeterministic, how is this compatible with the view that consciousness is predetermined?
Last edited: