Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I think that your typical Westerner perceives pantheism as being monotheistic by default because the typical Westerner is too immersed and ingrained in a monotheistic society to think otherwise.
Depends on how the connection between humans and god is viewed. In panentheism god is part of the universe as well as transcending it. So long as your interpretation doesn't have a problem calling humans divine, but my understanding of orthodox Judaism would be that God does not share in his glory and that we are separate creations from god. Of course a religion can hold just about any theology, I have even heard of atheist jews but I doubt they would be orthodox.Wait a minute. Orthodox Judaism is panentheistic. Does that mean I am part of two DIR's?
Perhaps in the same way the 'Orthodox' Christianity DIR might be your DIR. My suggestion is to read about Panentheism and see if it is what you adhere to. However, technically traditional Judaism falls outside Pantheism and Panentheism alike, since the idea that creation is akin to God, or that God is found in creation itself (or that creation is inside God) is not in line with traditional Jewish theology in which there is clear separation between Creator and creation.Wait a minute. Orthodox Judaism is panentheistic. Does that mean I am part of two DIR's?
Depends on how the connection between humans and god is viewed. In panentheism god is part of the universe as well as transcending it. So long as your interpretation doesn't have a problem calling humans divine, but my understanding of orthodox Judaism would be that God does not share in his glory and that we are separate creations from god. Of course a religion can hold just about any theology, I have even heard of atheist jews but I doubt they would be orthodox.
It is a subtle difference that gets into the mechanics of gods connection with humans. Panentheism can be a personal creator god but to me it seems that panentheism makes it easier to fathom how humans can connect with god, because god is transcending and part of its creation. Otherwise god would have complete sovereignty and we would be completely at its mercy, which goes with the concept of an all powerful all knowing being.I guess it depends what divine means. But we're on the Wikipedia page for Panentheism if that means anything.
It is a subtle difference that gets into the mechanics of gods connection with humans. Panentheism can be a personal creator god but to me it seems that panentheism makes it easier to fathom how humans can connect with god, because god is transcending and part of its creation. Otherwise god would have complete sovereignty and we would be completely at its mercy, which goes with the concept of an all powerful all knowing being.
I would say so. What would you say? Is the universe all in one God, or is everything a separate God on its own?
Are all things god? Or are all things a god?
I thought about it, and I decided that my question fits into this thread:
What are the principles that make Panentheism a distinct form of theism, especially vis a vis monotheism?
The terms Pan(En) are what make it distinct meaning "all is within" God. I understand monotheism in terms of Abrahamic religions to mean god can be omnipresent, which in a way is saying the opposite that god is within it's creation and distinct. When saying all is within god, god is omnipresent by virtue of being part of its own creation.What are the principles that make Panentheism a distinct form of theism, especially vis a vis monotheism?
Immanence, that's the word I'm looking for, which really is transcendent IMO. At least immanence shows how transcendence could be even possible and not just a attribute of being all powerful.I'd probably go with:
1) In mainstream Western culture, monotheism tends to be taken as synonymous with classical monotheism, which places a very strong focus on transcendence with little (if any) belief in divine immanence.
2) Neither pantheism nor panentheism must be monotheistic, as has been noted earlier.
I just realized this thread was about pantheism, not panentheism. My mistake. :sorry1:
Well personally, I'm panentheistic, there's infinite amount and one at the same time.
Maybe that doesn't make me 100% monotheist but in all I think it all boils down to one unity. I also revere some of the separate aspects so that might sound polytheistic to some.
In all, it's both simple and complicated.
I'd probably go with:
1) In mainstream Western culture, monotheism tends to be taken as synonymous with classical monotheism, which places a very strong focus on transcendence with little (if any) belief in divine immanence.
2) Neither pantheism nor panentheism must be monotheistic, as has been noted earlier.