Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
If it's deemed to be preaching and proselytizing you get called more than names, you are issued a warning and the post gets deleted... if this happens enough, it has the potential to lead to a permanent banTheoretically yes...
but some people who ignore what politeness is, might call you names
People do it all the time.Just curious if posting in opposition to the items mentioned, is allowed from a conservative historical point of view?
1. Homosexuality
2. Same Sex Marriage
3. Abortion
Yes, but if you can only point to your interpretation of a holy book you will probably not be taken to seriously. And don't forget, morals were different in the past often for good reasons at that time. We may not be living under the same constraints today as people were living under in the past. An argument of "they used to do it that way" will not stand either. You will need to demonstrate why we should still do it that way.Just curious if posting in opposition to the items mentioned, is allowed from a conservative historical point of view?
1. Homosexuality
2. Same Sex Marriage
3. Abortion
btw...welcome to the forum , Truth7t7
As a matter of fact, right-wing ideas are not appreciated by many people in this forum. No matter how respectfully you express them
Democracy at its best
Just curious if posting in opposition to the items mentioned, is allowed from a conservative historical point of view?
1. Homosexuality
2. Same Sex Marriage
3. Abortion
There are quite a few gay members it seems here. One thing that one must realize is that many of them will perceive an attack on homosexuality a personal attack against them. So one needs to tread lightly on both sides of this issue. I inadvertently offended a member that is trans due to my ignorance of the subject. So not only the religious can be guilty when it comes to such offenses.Respectful debate implies
1 no name calling
2 no sarcasm
3 no attacks ad personam
I really hope they do respect this new member
This is a predominantly liberal forum.... it's amusing watching conservatives repeatedly kick a wall that doesn't budge.Just curious if posting in opposition to the items mentioned, is allowed from a conservative historical point of view?
1. Homosexuality
2. Same Sex Marriage
3. Abortion
It's ok - we gon' build our own:This is a predominantly liberal forum.... it's amusing watching conservatives repeatedly kick a wall that doesn't budge.
Just curious if posting in opposition to the items mentioned, is allowed from a conservative historical point of view?
1. Homosexuality
2. Same Sex Marriage
3. Abortion
I would also say that liberal ideas are not appreciated by many people in this forum. No matter how respectfully you express thembtw...welcome to the forum , Truth7t7
As a matter of fact, right-wing ideas are not appreciated by many people in this forum. No matter how respectfully you express them
Democracy at its best
btw...welcome to the forum , Truth7t7
As a matter of fact, right-wing ideas are not appreciated by many people in this forum. No matter how respectfully you express them
Democracy at its best
Right, and name calling, personal attacks, etc. are against the rules, so you should report it to the mods when you see it.Respectful debate implies
1 no name calling
2 no sarcasm
3 no attacks ad personam
Regarding abortion, I'm Catholic and believe life begins at conception, so to kill an unborn baby is homicide.Just curious if posting in opposition to the items mentioned, is allowed from a conservative historical point of view?
1. Homosexuality
2. Same Sex Marriage
3. Abortion
I haven't seen anyone banned for posting in opposition to whatever. It might even open up your eyes a bit, see it's not all black and white...
To me it's simply a matter of logical and intellectual consistency. I can "appreciate" just about any point of view, so long as it's discussed in a consistent manner and doesn't rest on fundamental double standards. The obverse to this is that I often end up in conflict with people whose views are similar to my own because they base them on inconsistencies and double standards.It's not necessarily a matter of whether others 'appreciate' them, though.
It's a matter of whether they are within the rules. And whether the response to them is within the rules.