Ceridwen018
Well-Known Member
LCMS,
I recognize 'sin' from the standpoint of morality. Killing is bad, lying is bad, etc. All of those are 'sins' to you. I also believe them to be bad and amoral things, I just don't call them sin. That said, I believe that man can do much wrong.
A question for you: If man can do wrong, why discuss religion? Why does that matter?
For the love of the debate.
I do not believe in an afterlife, therefore in my opinion, those who believe in god aren't 'stewing' at all, they're just living their lives differently than mine. That doesn't mean that I can't question them, though. In fact, that is what this glorious site is dedicated to: questioning and debating.
The recognition of sin means the recognition of god and therefore there is no argument, let alone an easy one.
However, without the 'recognition' or 'belief' in sin, one can look at things objectively, and if by 'saying whatever I want' you mean 'saying what is most logical', then I absolutely agree.
In all truth, I never said it mattered. I am here for the same reason most other people are here: the debate. Society advances by people tossing around ideas and reaching new conclusions. It is all necessary.
In order for this argument to have merit you must recognize sin. If you believe that man can do no wrong and he does not need to be saved then we shouldn't discuss things anymore. If man can do no wrong, why discuss religion?
I recognize 'sin' from the standpoint of morality. Killing is bad, lying is bad, etc. All of those are 'sins' to you. I also believe them to be bad and amoral things, I just don't call them sin. That said, I believe that man can do much wrong.
A question for you: If man can do wrong, why discuss religion? Why does that matter?
Why not just let us all stew in our "misplaced belief."
For the love of the debate.
I do not believe in an afterlife, therefore in my opinion, those who believe in god aren't 'stewing' at all, they're just living their lives differently than mine. That doesn't mean that I can't question them, though. In fact, that is what this glorious site is dedicated to: questioning and debating.
The recognition of sin makes the argument for God so easy however without i you can say whatever you want.
The recognition of sin means the recognition of god and therefore there is no argument, let alone an easy one.
However, without the 'recognition' or 'belief' in sin, one can look at things objectively, and if by 'saying whatever I want' you mean 'saying what is most logical', then I absolutely agree.
If you don't need God to save you then why does religion matter?
In all truth, I never said it mattered. I am here for the same reason most other people are here: the debate. Society advances by people tossing around ideas and reaching new conclusions. It is all necessary.