Open_Minded
Nothing is Separate
Hello Mr. Spinkles:
Mr. Spinkles - You make valid points. Overall I feel no need to debate the matter. At the end of the day it's not going to be settled in this thread. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy lists multiple Quantum Approaches to Consciousness.
I'll leave it for those a lot smarter than I am to figure out the details. My overall point might be better addressed through a different avenue. Earlier in this thread godNotgod pointed me to a book entitled: War of the Worldviews: Where Science and Spirituality Meet -- and Do Not
But - it is Leonard's life experiences which cause his skepticism to "outweigh his desire". We each come to our understanding of the reality/the universe, etc... through our life experiences.
If you've been following my conversation with Legion - then you'll have a handle on my life experiences. My life experiences (and I've had my skeptic periods, and doubts) have led me to the point where I am at. I just ended up on the other side of the same coin, that's all:
Where I take issue with Leonard's analysis of the situation is that it is not "desire" that lands me here. As I mentioned in my responses to Legion, having premonitions is not always a pleasant experience. It is not pleasant at all to have someone answer your phone call with bad news. It is definitely not pleasant - in fact it is down right unsettling and depressing - to "feel" another person's pain event though they are miles away. So .. I personally take issue with Leonard's assumption that those of us who end up on the other side of the coin from him are doing it by "desire". I ended up feeling the way I feel BECAUSE my life experiences are every bit as valid as his, they just let me to a different place. For me, my life experiences have outweighed the skepticism I've felt. Part of my life experiences are other people noticing the same thing in me that I notice in myself. Contrary to the thinking of some skeptics my experiences are not 100% subjective.
And somehow - deep within myself - I do think there is a meeting place for us humans. I don't presume to have all the answers, it would be nice if folks like Leonard (and Deepak) would presume not to have all the answers as well.
The world would be a lot better off if the "certain ones" amongst us (like Leonard and Deepak) would board Ymir's boat of "smug uncertainity".
That's a very touching story. I am sorry for your loss, and I assure you that I have lost loved ones too (haven't we all?) I do agree we can never know what is happening "within" although in some cases we can get gather evidence which gives an indication. All I would emphasize here is that (1) if people in comas can hear what is going on around them, that does not require your hypothesis of a "transmitter" beyond the physical brain; (2) FWIW, if your hypothesis is wrong and mine is correct, and there is no transmitter beyond the brain, I don't think that would make human life any less precious or the ability of coma patients to hear loved ones any less remarkable. We would just have a transmitter or "soul" made out of squishy grey stuff instead of being made out of ethereal wonderstuff. Why should we embrace hope and optimism in one case, but not the other? That seems to me an arbitrary human prejudice. In either case, souls are weird, life is precious, and optimism is a good thing.
But FWIW your article talks about other scientists from other reputable universities, like Columbia, who dispute the "Love Study". And your article implies that the results of most good studies disagree with the one "Love Study". You don't write off those scientists or studies or universities either, right? From your article:
Maybe. That seems to be your favored hypothesis, and you offered an article in support of it, which I read. I favor a different hypothesis, and in support of it I offer you this video, which in the spirit of Open Mindedness I hope you will watch when you have time.
Mr. Spinkles - You make valid points. Overall I feel no need to debate the matter. At the end of the day it's not going to be settled in this thread. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy lists multiple Quantum Approaches to Consciousness.
I'll leave it for those a lot smarter than I am to figure out the details. My overall point might be better addressed through a different avenue. Earlier in this thread godNotgod pointed me to a book entitled: War of the Worldviews: Where Science and Spirituality Meet -- and Do Not
I am in the process of reading this book right now. At this point (about 1/3 of the way through) I've found much interesting reading, but am a bit disappointed. There seems to be little effort by either author to find common ground. Maybe by the end of the book, this dynamic will change. But --- applicable to our current discussion ---- following are physicist's,Leonard Mlodinow's, closing comments for his essay on What is Life:Two bestselling authors first met in a televised Caltech debate on “the future of God,” one an articulate advocate for spirituality, the other a prominent physicist. This remarkable book is the product of that serendipitous encounter and the contentious—but respectful—clash of worldviews that grew along with their friendship.
In War of the Worldviews these two great thinkers battle over the cosmos, evolution and life, the human brain, and God, probing the fundamental questions that define the human experience.
Leonard hit the core issue here in why there is a disconnect between skeptics and the rest of us. He got one thing wrong - I'll come back to that in a minute.I spoke with my father while writing this book. For as long as I can remember I have feared for his health. When I spoke to him the other night he reassured me that he is alive and well, in the same way he has reassured me each time I've seen him over the last twenty years - in my dreams. My father died two decades ago but I'd obviously rather not accept it. I'd rather believe that he has rejoined the universe, or gone on living in some other form. Unfortunately, for me the desire is not strong enough to outweigh the skepticism.
But - it is Leonard's life experiences which cause his skepticism to "outweigh his desire". We each come to our understanding of the reality/the universe, etc... through our life experiences.
If you've been following my conversation with Legion - then you'll have a handle on my life experiences. My life experiences (and I've had my skeptic periods, and doubts) have led me to the point where I am at. I just ended up on the other side of the same coin, that's all:
Where I take issue with Leonard's analysis of the situation is that it is not "desire" that lands me here. As I mentioned in my responses to Legion, having premonitions is not always a pleasant experience. It is not pleasant at all to have someone answer your phone call with bad news. It is definitely not pleasant - in fact it is down right unsettling and depressing - to "feel" another person's pain event though they are miles away. So .. I personally take issue with Leonard's assumption that those of us who end up on the other side of the coin from him are doing it by "desire". I ended up feeling the way I feel BECAUSE my life experiences are every bit as valid as his, they just let me to a different place. For me, my life experiences have outweighed the skepticism I've felt. Part of my life experiences are other people noticing the same thing in me that I notice in myself. Contrary to the thinking of some skeptics my experiences are not 100% subjective.
And somehow - deep within myself - I do think there is a meeting place for us humans. I don't presume to have all the answers, it would be nice if folks like Leonard (and Deepak) would presume not to have all the answers as well.
The world would be a lot better off if the "certain ones" amongst us (like Leonard and Deepak) would board Ymir's boat of "smug uncertainity".
History of that term follows
Post
(Maybe by the end of the book they will both come to terms with their common humanity - but I'm not holding my breath. sigh)Post
PostHehe. I just might steal this line, with your permission, of course. I quite like it.You've embraced smug uncertainty now.
Welcome to the boat of smug uncertainty. Grab an oar. We'll get to the next destination faster if we work as a team - I think.:canoe:
Last edited: