At this point in time I consider my religion as "undefined"; much like you can't divide by zero.
This is vague. Do you have religious beliefs or not? If you are confused then you aren't in a place to be making any definitive claims about reality and science.
All humans always make sense in terms of their premises. I don't share a lot of premises with many people. We are each homo circularis rationatio and the only species or thing in existence that is illogical and we are illogical by definition. I find common ground with many religions and most people.
I didn't ask about common ground, I asked if you reject the many diverse claims of different gods from other religions. To say "common ground" is vague and clarifies nothing. If you are hiding your assumptions that you share with other theists then perhaps you understand that you have dubious premises that distort any conclusions you make.
I am not religious but am spiritual.
This is more vague confusion. And again short on details about what you think the difference is. We all know that many believers are actually religious but are ashamed of it and deny being religious for the more acceptable word "spiritual". You seem to be hiding quite a bit, but we can see how your beliefs affect your conclusions about reality, and do so in a way that distorts what we understand of reality. The question I have is how much you are hiding from yourself since we skeptics can see the effects of religious assumptions in your posts but you don't.
I'm not really guessing. I know I can't know. I am merely suggesting possibilities that may be in keeping with my beliefs (that all people make sense and reality exists).
Who cares? It's apparent your assumtions and "possibilities" are religious in nature. Are you trying to fool us, or just yourself? We can see the "religion" in your guesses, but you seem confused about it. As you admit, you consider your religious undefined. So you do have beliefs, but can you manage them, and can you separate out your beliefs from what is true about how things are? Thus far it looks as though you are struggling. We see many theists try to infuse their religious assumptions into descriptions of reality so they can justify their religious beliefs to themselves, and do this in forums to work it all out. I wonder how much this is subconscious versus conscious in the believer.
I seek truth and understanding. I long sought to understand thought and it is still a consideration.
Facts and science is truth. Religious lore is not. But we humans evolved with certain anxieties and we are attracted to the traditions of religious belief, and often adopt the ideas subconsciously. these ideas are like viruses that infect thinking. And without skilled reasoning the believer can be in a confused state trying to reconcile the emotional comfirt of religious belief and the hard reality of science.