Is Science the Best Method to Understand the World?

[paarsurrey]

Please use a reason justified argument, if you are capable of that.

That you don't in effect like philosophy, is a subjective feeling in you. Start using rationality also. You can combine them if you like. But knowledge, truth and all that has nothing to do with feelings. If that was the case, God would exists. And I know you don't accept that so start using rationality and learn its limit.

" If that was the case, God would exists."

I don't get one's argument, please. Kindly elaborate. Right, please?

Regards

 

[PureX]

I find:
Law of noncontradiction - Wikipedia
Right, please?

Regards

wiki ... "In logic, the law of non-contradiction (LNC) (also known as the law of contradiction, principle of non-contradiction (PNC), or the principle of contradiction) states that contradictory propositions cannot both be true in the same sense at the same time, e. g. the two propositions "A is B" and "A is not B" are mutually exclusive."

"... In the same sense at the same time..."

This is a very unclear and inarticulate criteria requrement. Let's look at the Doppler Effect. Person 1, person 2, and person 3 are all hearing the same train horn sounding at the same time. Yet person 1 hears the horn as an E pitch. While person 2 hears it as a C pitch, and person 3 hears the horn as an A pitch. It's the same horn on the same train being heard by all three people at the same time. And the horn can only produce a single pitch; yet three people are hearing three different pitches simultaneously.

This presumed "law of non-contradiction" can only accurately apply to a single point perspective. Which, in effect, makes it useless.

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

Does one needs more of the sentiments, the present ones are not sufficient for you, please? Love plays the most positive roles and motives in human life, can one deny it, please? Right, please?

Regards

Yeah, but there is more to the world than feel and sentiments. There is all the physical.

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

" If that was the case, God would exists."

I don't get one's argument, please. Kindly elaborate. Right, please?

Regards

If all you needed for all of the world was feelings, the feeling of need a Go would cause God to exist. That is apparently not the case.

 

[Audie]

wiki ... "In logic, the law of non-contradiction (LNC) (also known as the law of contradiction, principle of non-contradiction (PNC), or the principle of contradiction) states that contradictory propositions cannot both be true in the same sense at the same time, e. g. the two propositions "A is B" and "A is not B" are mutually exclusive."

"... In the same sense at the same time..."

This is a very unclear and inarticulate criteria requrement. Let's look at the Doppler Effect. Person 1, person 2, and person 3 are all hearing the same train horn sounding at the same time. Yet person 1 hears the horn as an E pitch. While person 2 hears it as a C pitch, and person 3 hears the horn as an A pitch. It's the same horn on the same train being heard by all three people at the same time. And the horn can only produce a single pitch; yet three people are hearing three different pitches simultaneously.

This presumed "law of non-contradiction" can only accurately apply to a single point perspective. Which, in effect, makes it useless.

Hmm. Single point in time and space?
So, one datum point? Is that the same as single
point perspective?

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

Hmm. Single point in time and space?
So, one datum point? Is that the same as single
point perspective?

Or maybe methodological solipsism in philosophy. The world is, how it works for you. While we as humans share aspects, the world is not the exactly the same to us, because we are in the world, parts of the world and we are not the same parts.

 

[paarsurrey]

If all you needed for all of the world was feelings, the feeling of need a Go would cause God to exist. That is apparently not the case.

Hasn't one accepted that needs are there, why not accept G-d, please?
Right, please?
Is there a harm in accepting G-d. please? Right, please?

Regards
_____________
[35:16] یٰۤاَیُّہَا النَّاسُ اَنۡتُمُ الۡفُقَرَآءُ اِلَی اللّٰہِ ۚ وَ اللّٰہُ ہُوَ الۡغَنِیُّ الۡحَمِیۡدُ ﴿۱۶﴾
O ye men, it is you that stand in need of Allah, but Allah is He Who is Self-Sufficent, the Praiseworthy.
35:17] اِنۡ یَّشَاۡ یُذۡہِبۡکُمۡ وَ یَاۡتِ بِخَلۡقٍ جَدِیۡدٍ ﴿ۚ۱۷﴾
If He please, He could destroy you, and bring a new creation instead.
35:18] وَ مَا ذٰلِکَ عَلَی اللّٰہِ بِعَزِیۡزٍ ﴿۱۸﴾
And that is not difficult for Allah.

(28:24:15) faqīrun (in) need فَقَالَ رَبِّ إِنِّي لِمَا أَنْزَلْتَ إِلَيَّ مِنْ خَيْرٍ فَقِيرٌ
(41:10:10) aqwātahā its sustenance وَقَدَّرَ فِيهَا أَقْوَاتَهَا فِي أَرْبَعَةِ أَيَّامٍ سَوَاءً

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

Hasn't one accepted that needs are there, why not accept G-d, please?
Right, please?
Is there a harm in accepting G-d. please? Right, please?

Regards

That depends on what you consider harm and how that can be connected to certain beliefs in G-d.