I found an interesting news story somewhere that proves to me what I was afraid of: evolutionists constantly change their rhetoric and therefore cannot be trusted at all.
The news story says that evolutionists AGAIN believe that the apes that transformed into humans originally lived in Europe and then moved to Africa.
They are as fickle as the stock market. Who are you betting on this week? Africa, Asia, Europa, Australia?
If you are the sort to believe Genesis 1 is history, I have no problem with you. I'm very laid back when others disagree with me, even when I hold an opinion quite strongly. I have no illusions that my arguments will change any minds. I simply love the discussion and enjoy expressing my thoughts, just as I enjoy reading yours.
I can see why we might seem "fickle" to you. However, the word "fickle" usually means often changing who you are loyal to, or what your feelings for someone are. That's not what's going on here.
I'm sure that one of the mantras you hear ad infinitum is "We are loyal to the evidence, not the conclusions." What this means is that if and when we get new evidence, and that new evidence impacts a previous conclusion, we change our conclusion rather than try to force the evidence into supporting our preconceived ideas. This is a GOOD thing. Where you see "fickleness," I see the humility to know that we are sometimes wrong, and the ability to guard against bias.
Far from being "fickle," we are absolutely unwavering in our commitment to the evidence.
It's the very opposite of religions that are fundamentalist in nature. These begin with the conclusion, such as God made the world in six days and in this order, and then go out looking for evidence to support it, ignoring all evidence to the contrary. Perhaps creationists think of themselves as being "faithful to the truth," but what I see is them being so dogmatic that they wouldn't know the truth if it bit them in the face. "Don't confuse me with the facts! My mind is made up!"