• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Is the media coverage of the Church really fair and unbiased?

-Peacemaker-

.45 Cal
Why is it seem like the vast majority of "news" that secular media seems to cover in regards to the Church (Christianity) seems to revolve are sex scandals and queers? Is that really the extent of the Church's relevancy in the 21st Century? Do people realize that the Church is on the forefront when it comes to caring for sick and the homeless? Why does the media seem to shy away from covering stories in which people's lives improved because of what the Church provided? Which leads to another question, is the term "secular" in America often a code word for a "religion", one who's tenets are built on rationalism (ie. worship of the self), and sexual "freedom"? In other words, is "secularism" in America another name for a movement which opposes everything that Jesus stands for and is indeed anti-Christian? Is the media actively trying to promote its "values"?
 
Last edited:

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I'm suggesting that there is an anti-Christian slant to it
I'm inclined to agree that there generally is, but variation between different sources is great.
We just can't expect unbiased, objective & fair coverage of any issue, be it guns, economics,
politics, religion, etc, etc. If anything, I'd say the bias against Xtian churches is less.
 

Kilgore Trout

Misanthropic Humanist
As far as I can tell, some of the most anti-Christian movements (certainly un-Christian) are probably various flavors of Christianity itself. Particularly the ones focused on hate, discrimination, judgement, and division (all things specifically un-Christ-like).
 

Skwim

Veteran Member
Why is it seem like the vast majority of "news" that secular media seems to cover in regards to the Church (Christianity) seems to revolve are sex scandals and queers?
"Queers"? FYI:
Queer is an umbrella term for sexual and gender minorities that are not heterosexual, heteronormative, or gender-binary.
The term is generally controversial because it was reappropriated to an extent in the 1990s from its use as an anti-gay epithet. Furthermore, some LGBT people disapprove of using queer as a catch-all because they consider it offensive, derisive or self-deprecating given its continuous use as a form of hate speech.
Source: Wikipedia
I think you can do better than "queer."

Is that really the extent of the Church's relevancy in the 21st Century? Do people realize that the Church is on the forefront when it comes to caring for sick and the homeless?
Really! Care to back up that statement? Also, just what is this "Church" you speak of? Does it include the Mormon church and the Westboro Baptist church? How about the church of Satan and the church of Scientology, or the Church of Euthanasia ?


Why does the media seem to shy away from covering stories in which people's lives improved because of what the Church provided?
Ain't news worthy. Lots of other people and organizations do the very same thing.

Which leads to another question, is the term "secular" in America often a code word for a "religion", one who's tenets are built on rationalism (ie. worship of the self), and sexual "freedom"?
Here, maybe this will clear it up.
sec·u·lar

[sek-yuh-ler]
adjective 1. of or pertaining to worldly things or to things that are not regarded as religious, spiritual, or sacred; temporal: secular interests.

2. not pertaining to or connected with religion ( opposed to sacred ): secular music.

3. (of education, a school, etc.) concerned with nonreligious subjects.

4. (of members of the clergy) not belonging to a religious order; not bound by monastic vows ( opposed to regular ).

5. occurring or celebrated once in an age or century: the secular games of Rome.


re·li·gion


[ri-lij-uh
thinsp.png
thinsp.png
n]
noun 1. a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe, especially when considered as the creation of a superhuman agency or agencies, usually involving devotional and ritual observances, and often containing a moral code governing the conduct of human affairs.

2. a specific fundamental set of beliefs and practices generally agreed upon by a number of persons or sects: the Christian religion; the Buddhist religion.

3. the body of persons adhering to a particular set of beliefs and practices: a world council of religions.

4. the life or state of a monk, nun, etc.: to enter religion.

5. the practice of religious beliefs; ritual observance of faith.

Source: Dictionary.com


In other words, is "secularism" in America another name for a movement which opposes everything that Jesus stands for and is indeed anti-Christian?
Does it fit the definition above?
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
First thing you need to learn about communication and sources:
NOTHING is unbiased.
....especially anyone claiming to be unbiased.

Ya know, the church (I know this is a very broad brush) brought on much of their trouble.
If they weren't covering up child sexual abuse & otherwise enabling heinous crimes, their
stock wouldn't have fallen so low.
 

Me Myself

Back to my username
As far as I can tell, some of the most anti-Christian movements (certainly un-Christian) are probably various flavors of Christianity itself. Particularly the ones focused on hate, discrimination, judgement, and division (all things specifically un-Christ-like).

Heh... Ironically true.
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
Is it even possible to know whether someone is unbiased?

It is of course good practice to try and avoid being too biased, but it is not always possible, reasonable or healthy to avoid strong opinions.

That said, I'm not sure an anti-Christian bias, even if clearly established to exist, would be something to avoid. The Church does after all enjoy a lot of privilege.
 

ChristineES

Tiggerism
Premium Member
I don't think there is any news media that isn't biased against something or another. News is sensationalized on all fronts- which is why I've switched from just reading the headlines in various different sources online and have steered away from TV news.

I don't really see any discrimination against Christians in The US- I see criticism- I see criticism for just about everything nowadays, but criticism is hardly the same thing as persecution or discrimination. People don't treat me any differently than anyone else even when they know I'm a Christian- probably because I don't preach to them. Some people who are not religious may even engage me in talking about my faith- doesn't normally happen, but once in a blue moon. In turn, I listen to them, too.

I just think people are more outspoken these days- about everything, not just religions.
 

-Peacemaker-

.45 Cal
Skwim: here's another definition.

code word

noun 1. code name.

2. a euphemistic or politically acceptable catchword or phrase used instead of a blunter or less acceptable term: The official report said the diplomats had a “frank and serious discussion”—code words for “angry argument.”




Here's some common examples used in the media:

inner city/ghetto = black community

In football when they describe a white guy as: lacking the athleticism of some of his peers but has intangibles such as being "heady",a "team player", and "instinctive"= they're claiming he is smarter and is more well-adjusted than his predominantly black counterparts.



The point is that these aren't just figments of the imagination.
 
Last edited:

dyanaprajna2011

Dharmapala
Ah, this must be about that huge anti-Christian, mass conspiracy I keep hearing about, but never seeing. Of course the media is biased against Christianity, it's biased against all religion, especially if it's something that goes against religious teaching. Why? Because it sells.
 

Falvlun

Earthbending Lemur
Premium Member
The media must also be biased against almost every single other religion, race, ethnicity, socio-economic status since they seem to predominately only report about them when they do bad stuff too.
 

Katzpur

Not your average Mormon
Also, just what is this "Church" you speak of? Does it include the Mormon church and the Westboro Baptist church? How about the church of Satan and the church of Scientology, or the Church of Euthanasia ?
:facepalm: Wow. That's quite an interesting list you've compiled. I can't help but wonder how much thought you put into it and to what degree you consider these five churches similar to each other...

Mormon Church
Westboro Baptist Church
Church of Satan
Church of Scientology
Church of Euthanasia

I'm not going to speak on behalf of the last four churches on your list, but I will definitely say that media coverage of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is, in most cases, unfair, biased, and perhaps most important of all, inaccurate.
 
Top