EtuMalku
Abn Iblis ابن إبليس
Of courseHave you looked into Albert Pike at all? He has an interesting book called Morals and Dogma.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Of courseHave you looked into Albert Pike at all? He has an interesting book called Morals and Dogma.
Better get your history correct, we have entire books written by Plato (are you thinking of Socrates?), as well as a plethora of writing by Pythagoras as well as his disciples.sidhartha gautama never wrote down any of his teachings, plato never wrote down any of his, pythagoras never wrote down any of his teachings, jesus never wrote down any of his. their followers did. i'm not trying to apotheosize anyone.
my only offering is that love transcends space, time, cultures, gender, sex, ethnicity, et al
kind of like ancient jewish people tried to apotheosize melchizedek. the OT and the NT doesn't condone idolatry, or a cult of personality, to anyone.
http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/10602-melchizedek
best wishes
Balance in still within the box of aversity. You want to transcend that box by going for harmony, not balance, imo.
And that is 'empathy' not 'love' or 'agape' . . .nope, empathy has been observed in other species too.
love is necessary for cooperation because two bodies sharing one mind are greater than the sum of their individual selves. two, or more, working together can accomplish so much more than individuals working by themselves and solely for selfish reasons. i'm not speaking of sacrifice. i'm speaking of being merciful
http://www.livescience.com/24800-animals-emotions-morality.html
http://news.discovery.com/animals/elephants-added-to-list-of-animals-that-show-empathy-140218.htm
e.g. Music is Harmony not a balance, it is composed of sound and silence organized in timesilence is balance. it is the 8th and everything came from no thing. bindu
Brilliant book.Of course
True, his works were written down posthumous, but there are records he lived when he did.The evidence suggests that Pythagoras did not write any books. No source contemporaneous with Pythagoras or in the first two hundred years after his death, including Plato, Aristotle and their immediate successors in the Academy and Lyceum, quotes from a work by Pythagoras or gives any indication that any works written by him were in existence.
And that is 'empathy' not 'love' or 'agape' . . .
Keep looking, keep focused . . . your Dæmon will reveal itself to you eventually!Brilliant book.
I currently wish I could find a single name or title which fits my deity. I constantly find sets of three. It is frustrating.
You sound like you are trying to find other examples of the light bringer archetype?
Ouch . . . now its 'compassion'compassion is considered to be loving, not antagonistic
http://www.thesaurus.com/browse/empathy?s=t
https://www.psychologytoday.com/basics/empathy
http://etymonline.com/index.php?term=love&allowed_in_frame=0
hatred, animosity is not capable of understanding another.
empathy is established through direct experience to another's state of mind.
http://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/do_mirror_neurons_give_empathy
as listed, with the exception of the correction on socrates, none of the teachers wrote anything themselves. i agree some were written posthumous by disciples. that is no contest; otherwise we wouldn't have known of anything regarding them.True, his works were written down posthumous, but there are records he lived when he did.
yep, compassion and empathy are synonyms.Ouch . . . now its 'compassion'
I love it when people just make things up.The Tanakh was completed in 450 BC ...
I'm a firm believer in the Platonic First Forms, they are the primordial ideals that become perpetual archetypesyep, compassion and empathy are synonyms.
you practice epeolatry at the expense of ideas?
an oriental philosopher once said, "once an idea is understood, words are no longer necessary.". Like the concept of lucifer would not be symbolized the same in one language, or culture, vs another.
Pythagoras lived around 400 years before the Essenes.as listed, with the exception of the correction on socrates, none of the teachers wrote anything themselves. i agree some were written posthumous by disciples. that is no contest; otherwise we wouldn't have known of anything regarding them.
pythagoras was known to be a member of the essenes at some point in his life.
According to the Talmud much of the contents of the Tanakh was compiled by the men of the Great Assembly (Anshei K'nesset HaGedolah), a task completed in 450 BCE, and has remained unchanged since that date.I love it when people just make things up.
not a problem. the essenes were nothing other than the group associated with mt. carmel and a esoteric group probably founded by moses.Pythagoras lived around 400 years before the Essenes.
Sure ...You got another reference?
Most scholars now date the writing of the Book of Esther to the late Persian or early Greek period, roughly between 400-200 B.C.E. (An older view saw it as the product of Hellenistic or Maccabean times.) To put the dating in a broader context, here are the dates generally given for some other biblical and apocryphal books.
For the reasons discussed below , I would place the writing of Esther earlier in the accepted period rather than later, about 400-300 B.C.E., after the reign of Xerxes and before the Hellenization of the East in the wake of Alexander.
- Ruth and Jonah: Persian period.
- Isaiah 40-66: 550-500 B.C.E.
- Haggai,Zechariah, Malachi: 500-300 B.C.E.
- Ezra-Nehemiah: 400-300 B.C.E.
- Chronicles: 400-300 B.C.E.
- Ecclesiastes: dated by most scholars to about 250 B.C.E., but C. L. Seow has recently proposed an earlier date, 450-350 B.C.E.
- Tobit: 225-175 B.C.E.
Daniel as a whole is dated in the Maccabean period (ca. 164 B.C.E.), but Chapters 1-6 may go back to the fourth or third centuries B.C.E.
Judith: about 100 B.C.E.
- Adele Berlin; JPS Bible Commentary: Esther
What part of 450 BC didn't you understand then?Sure ...