• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Is the pope a reincarnation of the emperor?

joachim_s

New Member
Hi!

I've just thought about it for a while. Has anyone else done so? I mean, the pope and the cardinals, aren't they just reincarnations of the roman emperor and the senate?

Kindly,
Joachim
 

Onkara

Well-Known Member
Not a spiritual reincarnation, but figuratively speaking they are the appear to be a continuation of power with a different name imho.
 

otokage007

Well-Known Member
Is the pope a reincarnation of the emperor?

Indeed:

2289830138_742df9d5a2_o.jpg


pope-benedict-palpatine.jpg


pope_looks_like_palpatine_02.jpg
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
For most of history, the two groups were involved in very similar roles, indeed.

I wouldn't however describe the situation as a reincarnation, even a symbolic one, because that would suggest that the causes are related mostly to those groups themselves, and I don't think it is true. For the most part it is a simple case of fulfilling a sociological demand of the cultures of the times.
 

Onkara

Well-Known Member
You funny suns of guns! :D
But, seriously, what do you think?

:D
I was being serious, so I am not sure what type of answer you are expecting? Perhaps you can give us your opinon to your question... it would be interesting to hear. :)
 

lunakilo

Well-Known Member
Hi!

I've just thought about it for a while. Has anyone else done so? I mean, the pope and the cardinals, aren't they just reincarnations of the roman emperor and the senate?

Kindly,
Joachim


Do you mean reincarnation literally?

As the link Quagmire provided explains the Pontifix Maximus was a high priest of Rome. Durring the Imperial era the emperor was also Pontifix Maximus.

When christianity became the state religion of Rome the Pope was the high priest in Rome. And after the west-roman empire collapsed the title was used by Christian bishop of Rome. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Pontifices_maximi notice the sentence "From some indeterminate later date to present, the title "Pontifex Maximus" is applied to the Popes." at the bottom of the list )

So historically speaking I suppose you could say that the pope is a reincarnation of the roman emperor.
 
Last edited:
A

angellous_evangellous

Guest
Hi!

I've just thought about it for a while. Has anyone else done so? I mean, the pope and the cardinals, aren't they just reincarnations of the roman emperor and the senate?

Kindly,
Joachim

I suppose that this comparison could be made if we completely ignore everything about Roman history and church structure. All of it.

And then make up something completely different in a crude, shallow, ignorant image of what we want it to look like in order for them to be "the same."
 
A

angellous_evangellous

Guest
I suppose that this comparison could be made if we completely ignore everything about Roman history and church structure. All of it.

And then make up something completely different in a crude, shallow, ignorant image of what we want it to look like in order for them to be "the same."

I take that back...

You don't have to take away all of Roman and church history -- you have to go full circle backwards into the negative. Then make up whatever you like and call it pie.
 
A

angellous_evangellous

Guest
BruceDLimber, I meant reincarnation in a symbolic way and sarcastic way.


angellous_evangellous, to say that it's all wrong making this comparison in a historical perspective, well that's just plain ignorant. The popes have had there share of intrerest in power quite a lot. Maybe you're a catholic and just got angry?

Then making the comparison is plain stupid. Or thoughtless. Take your pick.

If the basis of the comparison is "interest in power" then almost anyone in history who ever had an interest in power can be likened to Rome --- neverminding all of the historical incongruencies between the two. Now, if you want to throw aside all of history and equate things that have no inherent similarities, that's fine.

It's like comparing anyone that you don't like to the Nazis, which is the same kind of logical fallacy that you are employing. note: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_Hitlerum

You're embarrassing yourself.



By the way, I'm offended at the historical illiteracy and thoughtless comparison. I'm not Catholic (as if that's your business).
 
Last edited by a moderator:

BruceDLimber

Well-Known Member

It wasn't a joke.

The scriptures I endeavor to follow are quite explicit in denying the existence of reincarnation!

The censors here won't allow me to post the relevant quote even though it's eminently on-topic for this thread and had a full citation, but I'm on Facebook under this same name; and if you contact me there, I'll be more than happy to send it to you in a private message.

(One caveat: there may be some delay as I'll be out of town for a few days.)

Bruce
 

Breathe

Hostis humani generis
The scriptures I endeavor to follow are quite explicit in denying the existence of reincarnation!

That was a religious text, however - not a scholarly, peer-reviewed source.

Therefore, It does not really allow you to say "Reincarnation doesn't exist", but it does "We do not believe in reincarnation" in the same way I cannot use scripture or a quote from Hinduism and say "Reincarnation exists".
 
Top