• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Is Theory of Evolution absurdic?

Subduction Zone

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
questfortruth said:
The enemy will sweeten you with his mouth, but in his heart, he plots to plunge you into a pit: with his eyes, the enemy will weep; and when he finds an opportunity, he will not be satisfied with blood.
If misfortune meets you, you will find him there before yourself,
and he, as if wanting to help, will give you a leg: he will nod his head and clap his hands, he will whisper many things, and his face will change. Sirach 12:15-18.
Click to expand...
Quoting from a book of myths does not help you.
 
W

Wildswanderer

Veteran Member
Subduction Zone said:
No, we are not. Very similar to machines, but not machines. You are trying to use semantics as a source of evidence. You can only fool creationists with that poor logic.

You see you are trying to use the fact that human made genes are manufactured to get in your "designed claim". That is not allowed in the sciences. You can't be sneaky and think that you will not be laughed at.
Click to expand...
You are asking people to throw logic to the curb. Because genes are obviously complex machines that demand a designer, but you want to maintain a smoke screen with claims that we should ignore the obvious.
 
questfortruth

questfortruth

Well-Known Member
Wildswanderer said:
You are asking people to throw logic to the curb. Because genes are obviously complex machines that demand a designer, but you want to maintain a smoke screen with claims that we should ignore the obvious.
Click to expand...
An axiom does not require a proof because it has already been proven. Its obviousness scientifically proves it. The Riemann Hypothesis is not "obviously true''; therefore, it is not proven by obviousness. The Riemann Hypothesis is infinitely valuable with no harm, but it is not an axiom and never will be because it is not an obvious thing.

God is so obvious that He does not require a proof; God is Axiom: "I cannot imagine how the clockwork of the Universe can exist without a clockmaker.'' -- Voltaire (French Enlightenment writer 1694 -- 1778 AD).

Nobody ever has imagined a godless world. The Holy Angel Lucifer has tried very hard out of research interest but lost his mind.

Atheists would agree with Voltaire on everything; this believer is their funny puppy. But they will never agree with my conclusions because we disagree on the god-level, the deepest level of human personality: "If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, they will not be convinced even if someone rises from the dead.'' Luke 16:31.
 
Subduction Zone

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Wildswanderer said:
You are asking people to throw logic to the curb. Because genes are obviously complex machines that demand a designer, but you want to maintain a smoke screen with claims that we should ignore the obvious.
Click to expand...
No. I am asking people to properly use logic. You are not using logic. "It is obvious" is almost always false. If it was obvious it would be very easy to prove. That you have not even begun to support your claims alone refutes your claim that it was obvious since if it was you would have already supported your claim.

Do you remember that you claimed that you could show your faith to be rational? Right now you are refuting that claim of yours.
 
questfortruth

questfortruth

Well-Known Member
Subduction Zone said:
If it was obvious it would be very easy to prove.
Click to expand...
What is today?

There is no notion of today or now in Theory or Albert Einstein.
But we feel our body neither tomorrow nor yesterday, but right now.
Hence, the God is Today. Life is Today. Freewill is Today.
We feel God every day and now because God is Life itself.

Omniscient Being knows about own existence. Hence if to know all,
you must know the existence of such Being. And if not to know all, then God is not disproven.
Because no third answer possible, God exists.
 
Subduction Zone

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
questfortruth said:
What is today?

There is no notion of today or now in Theory or Albert Einstein.
But we feel our body neither tomorrow nor yesterday, but right now.
Hence, the God is Today. Life is Today. Freewill is Today.
We feel God every day and now because God is Life itself.

Omniscient Being knows about own existence. Hence if to know all,
you must know the existence of such Being.
Click to expand...
Sorry but we have an abundance of ways of defining when it is. Your argument is of one that does not understand time. It is likely a case of refusing to understand.

As to what "today" is there is a generally agreed definition. All language is like that . A general agreement about languages is what makes communication possible. Physicists when they talk about time have their own definitions and they work very well in their work. Are you confused about when it is?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top