What I think isn't really relevant. I'm asking these questions from your own perspective.Well before we go into is there what you ask above, do you think life began on this earth at a certain time? Maybe we can start there.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
What I think isn't really relevant. I'm asking these questions from your own perspective.Well before we go into is there what you ask above, do you think life began on this earth at a certain time? Maybe we can start there.
Since I can't figure what you mean by your question about death life death life I can't really answer SINCE I believe there is life and there is death and only God can give life and cause death in the long run. Even babies need two persons to start the life process. They did not give life to themselves.What I think isn't really relevant. I'm asking these questions from your own perspective.
I do think your thoughts are important. Relevant.What I think isn't really relevant. I'm asking these questions from your own perspective.
So what you're saying is that you don't believe in life after death?Since I can't figure what you mean by your question about death life death life I can't really answer SINCE I believe there is life and there is death and only God can give life and cause death in the long run. Even babies need two persons to start the life process. They did not give life to themselves.
No. I am saying that God can resurrect the dead. After that is still more to come but not as some religious teachings have it, such as eternal torture in a horrible fire or hot place. What it means is death after life after death.So what you're saying is that you don't believe in life after death?
So the question is, that new life after resurrection, does death follow that? Does it end? If so, when. If not, how?No. I am saying that God can resurrect the dead. After that is still more to come but not as some religious teachings have it, such as eternal torture in a horrible fire or hot place. What it means is death after life after death.
Could the philosophers be wrong?Philosopher's posited in the 16th century that "everything that has a beginning has an end."
Some in the first century did not believe in the resurrection. Paul gave a very good accounting in 1 Corinthians chapter 15 about this, but I quote a little from it. "But someone will ask, “How are the dead raised? With what kind of body will they come?” 36You fool! What you sow does not come to life unless it dies. 37And what you sow is not the body that will be, but just a seed, perhaps of wheat or something else. 38But God gives it a body as He has designed, and to each kind of seed He gives its own body."So the question is, that new life after resurrection, does death follow that? Does it end? If so, when. If not, how?
You were not alive in the past.Philosopher's posited in the 16th century that "everything that has a beginning has an end." So starting with the premise that there is life after death and that that life begins after death, doesn't logic dictate that this life after death will end at some point?
If so, how will it end? Is there life after death after life after death? If it happens once, what would end such a cycle?
If not, please explain your logic of how life after death would not end. And for the purpose of this thread, saying something to the extent that "it just doesn't" isn't an acceptable response, so if that's what your answer is, there is no need to respond.
_______________________________________________________________
When I was not alive, I experienced no past...no time at all. Just as in the state of deep sleep, anesthesia, or samadhi.You were not alive in the past.
You are alive now establishing a solid 1:? possibility. This phenomena can happen again and again, over and over. It happened before, it can certainly happen again.
When the lights do eventually come on , the questions are when, what, who, and where?
True and no cognizant connection with any past 'self' that is gone forever.When I was not alive, I experienced no past...no time at all. Just as in the state of deep sleep, anesthesia, or samadhi.
The appearance of linear time only exists when I'm awake or dreaming.
Philosopher's posited in the 16th century that "everything that has a beginning has an end." So starting with the premise that there is life after death and that that life begins after death, doesn't logic dictate that this life after death will end at some point?
If so, how will it end? Is there life after death after life after death? If it happens once, what would end such a cycle?
If not, please explain your logic of how life after death would not end. And for the purpose of this thread, saying something to the extent that "it just doesn't" isn't an acceptable response, so if that's what your answer is, there is no need to respond.
_______________________________________________________________
Actually, I made an error. It's 18th century, not 16th century. I went the wrong direction when I read "1702." I'll fix the OP momentarily.If you start off believing the 16th century philosophy you gave then a life after this one will end. But why would I believe the 16th century philosophy you gave?
Instead I believe that God can give eternal life if He want to.
I'm not sure where you got this idea from but before I studied the Bible's teachings about life and death, I might hear someone like you say what you said, and I'd think, What? What discouraging and awful thoughts. But I didn't know what the Bible said about life and death so I was in the dark as if there were obstacles around if I heard something like what you're sayingTrue and no cognizant connection with any past 'self' that is gone forever.
I think of it as a great reset from who we think we are, yet we all are still interconnected along with all new life in endless forms erupting all around us on this planet as death loses its grip in wake of new life coming to be before our very eyes.
It's why I think the proverbial 'lights' come on and off all the time.
Actually, I made an error. It's 18th century, not 16th century. I went the wrong direction when I read "1702." I'll fix the OP momentarily.
Can you please explain the difference between believing that philosophy and believing that God can give eternal life if He wants to?
Who knows?Are they?
Yes, there is a death after life after death. But also there a life after the second death. In fact that already happend!What I think isn't really relevant. I'm asking these questions from your own perspective.
"The soul of man is an experiential acquirement. As a mortal creature chooses to “do the will of the Father in heaven,” so the divine spirit that indwells the mind of man becomes the father of a new reality in human experience. The mortal and material mind is the mother of this same emerging reality. The substance of this new reality is neither material nor spiritual—it is something in between. This is the emerging and immortal soul which is destined to survive mortal death."I'm still not quite clear on what you are referring to as "the soul." The Atman?
Regarding a "second death" this is what the Urantia Book says about it. It only mentions it in relation to what happens with infants, who for whatever reason, pass on too soon:So the question is, that new life after resurrection, does death follow that? Does it end? If so, when. If not, how?