Is YE Creationist Kent Hovind right?

[Nimos]

There are many mistakes human do. Please look article link "My Worldview in full" in the thread.

Sorry, I don't see the link, might be looking the wrong place?

But not sure how that would change anything regardless, even if humans make a lot of mistakes.

Science is a study of the natural world and even if it is mistaken about things within this, I don't see how that has anything to do with the supernatural. Unless what you mean is that stuff that science gets wrong, does or could demonstrate the supernatural or something, but that science refuse to see it as such? (Maybe the article will make it more clear what you mean)

EDIT: Found the article

 

[questfortruth]

So conciliation is not in your dictionary?

The third world war must be won, because it is final war.

 

[Colt]

What about his lectures?

Humans didn't come from apes, we came from a line that the apes branched off of long, long ago. Humans are much more than animal, but we are related to animals, that's why we act like animals.

 

[questfortruth]

Science is a study of the natural world and even if it is mistaken about things within this, I don't see how that has anything to do with the supernatural. Unless what you mean is that stuff that science gets wrong, does or could demonstrate the supernatural or something, but that science refuse to see it as such? (Maybe the article will make it more clear what you mean)

Yes, science should broaden the logic driven search for truth on religions.

 

[ChristineM]

The third world war must be won, because it is final war.

What you call a 3rd world war is merely just a skirmish with occasional attosoties and local police action.

I don't think you have much idea of what a war actually Is.

 

[questfortruth]

Humans didn't come from apes, we came from a line that the apes branched off of long, long ago.

1. Common ancestor A gave line of humans and line of apes.
2. Hence, A gave line of apes.
3. Hence, A is ill, undeveloped ape.
4. Hence human "came" from apes.

 

[Nimos]

Yes, science should broaden the logic driven search for truth on religions.

Can you elaborate on that, just so I don't misunderstand you.

Do you mean that it should search for God?
Test to see if demons or angels exist?
If curses are real?

Science did actually test whether or not praying worked, if you mean stuff like that? And the study showed (if I don't remember wrong) that it had either no effect or slightly worse effect on the person, if they knew they were being prayed for.

The One Million Dollar Paranormal Challenge was an offer by the James Randi Educational Foundation (JREF) to pay out one million U.S. dollars to anyone who could demonstrate a supernatural or paranormal ability under agreed-upon scientific testing criteria. A version of the challenge was first issued in 1964. Over a thousand people applied to take it, but none were successful. The challenge was terminated in 2015.

 

[Colt]

1. Common ancestor A gave line of humans and line of apes.
2. Hence, A gave line of apes.
3. Hence, A is ill, undeveloped ape.
4. Hence human "came" from apes.

Your reasoning is broken. You should just stick with spirituality and not attempt science.

 

[questfortruth]

Can you elaborate on that, just so I don't misunderstand you.

Do you mean that it should search for God?
Test to see if demons or angels exist?
If curses are real?

It does study spirituality, but with agenda to prove atheism.

You should just stick with spirituality and not attempt science.

I have completed secondary school with Gold Medal, University with Cum Laude, I was lector and researcher at University, I am author in Physical Review E.

 

[firedragon]

How easy is it to be the smartest on the planet, where science has proven that apes gave birth to the human race?

It is very easy to be a genius when science has proven that humans are monkeys. Sorry, "primates". Proven that we are primates. It is easy to surpass the mind of all the scientists of the Earth because they proved that people are not people, but animals.

If a person is an animal, then there can be no angels. Here is a childish, unspoiled view of the world: plants, animals, people, angels, God. If people are enrolled in animals, then what happens? There will be no angels, no God.

If scientists have not proven the existence of people, then how can they find the angels?
My Worldview in full
To say that people are meaningless beasts means Nihilism. Cows and bears do not build temples, theaters, schools.

DISCUSSION:

Moshe: "There is no connection between mind and morality."

True Christian: "I proved the Riemann hypothesis and the abs with the help of God."

There are levels of power. If human level is missing, then the scientist can not find the level higher than humans.


There are many mistakes human do. Please look article link "My Worldview in full" in the thread.


I have completed secondary school with Gold Medal, University with Cum Laude, I was lector and researcher at University, I am author in Physical Review E.




If best CV in the world has zero value, then surely, USA and Mother Theresa have zero value.


If a brilliant scientist and an ordinary human were in life danger, and only one can be saved, the saved one will be scientist. Because we have the priorities and different values.


Heavenly Kingdom.


It is because the humankind is in third world war against terrorism. The terrorism is driven by evil spirits. At war hospitals the doctors must have priorities. There will be no war in Afterlife. The war must be won at any necessary cost.


The third world war must be won, because it is final war.


You could use your entire organism.


Tell it to your COVID pass or citizen pass. Tell it to USA independency declaration too.


1. Common ancestor A gave line of humans and line of apes.
2. Hence, A gave line of apes.
3. Hence, A is ill, undeveloped ape.
4. Hence human "came" from apes.


Yes, science should broaden the logic driven search for truth on religions.



Science does study spirituality, but with agenda to prove atheism.

He is a charlatan. Fraud.

 

[questfortruth]

He is a charlatan. Fraud.

Nobody is 100% bad. He is good in his lectures. That is why he is Christian Martyr.

 

[firedragon]

Nobody is 100% bad. He is good in his lectures. That is why he is Christian Martyr.

How in the world could a liar and a thief be a Christian Martyr? Is there no standard?

Everyone knows that he got his "Phd" from a house. His lies are everywhere.

If this is your standard, its unbelievable.

 

[questfortruth]

How in the world could a liar and a thief be a Christian Martyr?

1. Nobody is perfect.
2. Kent is believer.
3. Kent was in prison.
4. Hence, he is martyr.

 

[Daniel Nicholson]

I have completed secondary school with Gold Medal, University with Cum Laude, I was lector and researcher at University, I am author in Physical Review E.

I don't believe you.
Even if English is your second language (which would explain the writing errors) I don't believe you are a lector, researcher, and author.

 

[questfortruth]

I don't believe you.
Even if English is your second language (which would explain the writing errors) I don't believe you are a lector, researcher, and author.

CV: Dmitri Martila (etis.ee)

 

[mangalavara]

1. Nobody is perfect.
2. Kent is believer.
3. Kent was in prison.
4. Hence, he is martyr.

From what I recall, Kent went to prison for tax evasion, not his Baptist beliefs. Many martyrs in the Orthodox Church are far more admirable than that tax evader in Alabama.

 

[firedragon]

1. Nobody is perfect.
2. Kent is believer.
3. Kent was in prison.
4. Hence, he is martyr.

He was in prison for what? For fraud. Tax evasion, etc etc.

Its amazing that a crook, who went to prison for fraud, is called a Christian martyr because he went to prison for fraud.

Its the first time in my life I am hearing this level of logic.

 

[Nimos]

It does study spirituality, but with agenda to prove atheism.

It studies spirituality, never heard of that? I didn't even think there were a clear working definition of what spirituality even is in the first place, what are those fields called?

Prove atheism? that makes no sense, how or why would anyone try to prove that. It would be like someone setting out to prove that unicorns doesn't exists, that seems like a waste of time and money to be honest, with basically no chance of success.

How do you suggest that they should prove atheism?

 

[questfortruth]

It studies spirituality, never heard of that? I didn't even think there were a clear working definition of what spirituality even is in the first place, what are those fields called?

It is your information how science is studying spirituality. But this study is with agenda to demonstrate "absence" of spiritual realm - agenda to prove the core "assumption" of Atheism.

And the study showed (if I don't remember wrong) that it had either no effect or slightly worse effect on the person, if they knew they were being prayed for.

The One Million Dollar Paranormal Challenge was an offer by the James Randi Educational Foundation (JREF) to pay out one million U.S. dollars to anyone who could demonstrate a supernatural or paranormal ability under agreed-upon scientific testing criteria. A version of the challenge was first issued in 1964. Over a thousand people applied to take it, but none were successful. The challenge was terminated in 2015.

 

[Daniel Nicholson]

CV: Dmitri Martila (etis.ee)

I hope you don't mind if I am a little harsh with my criticisms of your posts, given your credentials. A less educated individual is entitled to make some logical errors, fallacy reasoning, etc., but if you are claiming to be educated to give weight to your arguments and character, I won't hold back.