Stop using Islam to defend yourselves(Men who think the same as Fatihah's statement)...stop using Islam as a banner to sanctionize us Women to dominancy!!!...
xxx
Response: And please stop using a feminist stance over what is common logic.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Stop using Islam to defend yourselves(Men who think the same as Fatihah's statement)...stop using Islam as a banner to sanctionize us Women to dominancy!!!...
xxx
Response: And please stop using a feminist stance over what is common logic.
Your ego will not let you accept that women would be just fine without us in their lives to "protect" and look after them.
We need women more than they need us.
Response: To the contrary, your ego led you to post a statement with no proof.
Men kill each other every day as well which is on par with rape. Do they need protection as well? Not in your book kind sir.
A poor example i'm afraid, perhaps you should take some time to think about this.
I am not being biased like you Fatihah...
Good old Fatihah.
Remember sir, i have seen many of your posts.
You need to learn to debate your way out of trouble instead of posting like you have here which adds nothing to the debate and is in fact rather petty.
I left my ego at the door in this one. I see women as equals and i love them for the attention they crave and their own ways of loving.
Having read this hread, it seems you'd be happier if they spent their lives in a cage outside of cooking, cleaning and performing sexual favours.
Would it be nice to move this thread to debates section?
Would it be nice to move this thread to debates section?
How is it poor. In many rape circumstances women are no worse off then a man would be. Either way, a bad thing is going to happen. To label it as a woman only problem is grossly presumptuous, assuming only women are raped and thus need protection from rapists.
Response: And again, I never said that it is a woman only problem. So far, since you've joined the dialogue, you've made assertions, with no proof, then go along and dispute it. Please try to speak on what is actually said and not use the strawman argument.
Dear Fatihah...
Not everything needs proof...
Indeed you are in error...
xxx
Oh no.
I thought it was a debate already. Looks like i'm going to need to do some deleting.
Fatihah rape is a total different issue!
xxx
I dont think you need to delete.BTW.Friend Fatihah has given his response (in the mean time).
Response: Only in your eyes, and those who think like you.
Saved the mod's some time.
I was having fun here, what a shame.
To Fatihah:
I am having trouble understanding how Islam claims to treat women as equals when all discussions thus far seem to suggest otherwise. Perhaps you could clarify things for me?
Uhh ..I forgot to see yours posts .The impersonal nature of Islam does not exactly match with Hinduism.Those sects which give more importance to impersonal feature believe in complete non-duality of creation and creator which is exactly opposed to Orthodox Islam.Moreover,they also consider the personal feature also to be true simultaneously. The monothesitic Hindus again emphasize personal God.Bothways,IMHO they are opposed to basic Islamic doctrines.Unless otherwise someone makes a compromise,I dont see any solution to settle this difference.
But then why should Gnostics inter-marry?Do they like to marry?I think AR, the reason that you are not finding any solution to settle this difference is because you are searching for unity too soon and with the wrong tools. The answer can be found at a deeper level with the help of gnostic knowledge and not dogmatic knowledge.
Regards.